Anker Stefan D, Doehner Wolfram, Rauchhaus Mathias, Sharma Rakesh, Francis Darrel, Knosalla Christoph, Davos Constantinos H, Cicoira Mariantonietta, Shamim Waqar, Kemp Michel, Segal Robert, Osterziel Karl Josef, Leyva Francisco, Hetzer Roland, Ponikowski Piotr, Coats Andrew J S
Applied Cachexia Research Unit, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Circulation. 2003 Apr 22;107(15):1991-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000065637.10517.A0. Epub 2003 Apr 21.
Serum uric acid (UA) could be a valid prognostic marker and useful for metabolic, hemodynamic, and functional (MFH) staging in chronic heart failure (CHF).
For the derivation study, 112 patients with CHF (age 59+/-12 years, peak oxygen consumption [Vo2] 17+/-7 mL/kg per minute) were recruited. In separate studies, we validated the prognostic value of UA (n=182) and investigated the relationship between MFH score and the decision to list patients for heart transplantation (n=120). In the derivation study, the best mortality predicting UA cutoff (at 12 months) was 565 micromol/L (9.50 mg/dL) (independently of age, peak Vo2, left ventricular ejection fraction, diuretic dose, sodium, creatinine, and urea; P<0.0001). In the validation study, UA >or=565 micromol/L predicted mortality (hazard ratio, 7.14; P<0.0001). In 16 patients (from both studies) with UA >or=565 micromol/L, left ventricular ejection fraction <or=25% and peak Vo2 <or=14 mL/kg per min (MFH score 3), 12-month survival was lowest (31%) compared with patients with 2 (64%), 1 (77%), or no (98%, P<0.0001) risk factor. In an independent study, 51% of patients with MFH score 2 and 81% of patients with MFH score 3 were listed for transplantation. The positive predictive value of not being listed for heart transplantation with an MFH score of 0 or 1 was 100%.
High serum UA levels are a strong, independent marker of impaired prognosis in patients with moderate to severe CHF. The relationship between serum UA and survival in CHF is graded. MFH staging of patients with CHF is feasible.
血清尿酸(UA)可能是慢性心力衰竭(CHF)有效的预后标志物,且对代谢、血流动力学和功能(MFH)分期有用。
在推导研究中,招募了112例CHF患者(年龄59±12岁,峰值耗氧量[Vo2]17±7 mL/kg每分钟)。在单独的研究中,我们验证了UA的预后价值(n = 182),并研究了MFH评分与将患者列入心脏移植名单的决策之间的关系(n = 120)。在推导研究中,预测死亡率的最佳UA临界值(12个月时)为565 μmol/L(9.50 mg/dL)(独立于年龄、峰值Vo2、左心室射血分数、利尿剂剂量、钠、肌酐和尿素;P<0.0001)。在验证研究中,UA≥565 μmol/L预测死亡率(风险比,7.14;P<0.0001)。在16例(来自两项研究)UA≥565 μmol/L、左心室射血分数≤25%且峰值Vo2≤14 mL/kg每分钟(MFH评分3)的患者中,12个月生存率最低(31%),与有2个(64%)、1个(77%)或无(98%,P<0.0001)风险因素的患者相比。在一项独立研究中,MFH评分2的患者中有51%以及MFH评分3的患者中有81%被列入移植名单。MFH评分为0或1未被列入心脏移植名单的阳性预测值为100%。
高血清UA水平是中度至重度CHF患者预后不良的一个强有力的独立标志物。血清UA与CHF患者生存率之间的关系是分级的。CHF患者的MFH分期是可行的。