Suppr超能文献

非布司他与别嘌醇在有或无痛风的亚洲患者中的心血管安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat versus allopurinol among the Asian patients with or without gout: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Longyan Second Hospital, Longyan, China.

Neurology Department, Longyan Second Hospital, Longyan, China.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Mar;17(3):e13757. doi: 10.1111/cts.13757.

Abstract

The cardiovascular (CV) safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia among Asian patients is uncertain. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the CV safety profiles of febuxostat with allopurinol in Asian patients with hyperuricemia. A total of 13 studies were included. On the basis of the pooled results of cohort studies, febuxostat users were at a significantly higher risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.09, p < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35, p < 0.01) than allopurinol users, whereas no significant difference between febuxostat and allopurinol existed for urgent coronary revascularization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.16, p = 0.13), and stroke (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01, p = 0.13). Nevertheless, that difference in results of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF; HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.53, p = 0.40) and all-cause death (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.49-1.51, p = 0.60) was not significant based on randomized controlled trials. In the Chinese subgroup, febuxostat could increase the risk of ADHF (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48, p < 0.05), CV death (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.50, p < 0.05), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p < 0.05) compared to allopurinol. In conclusion, the use of febuxostat, compared with allopurinol among Asian patients, was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse CV events.

摘要

在亚洲患者中,与别嘌醇相比,非布司他在治疗高尿酸血症方面的心血管(CV)安全性尚不确定。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较高尿酸血症亚洲患者中使用非布司他与别嘌醇的 CV 安全性。共纳入了 13 项研究。基于队列研究的汇总结果,与别嘌醇相比,非布司他使用者发生急性冠脉综合征(ACS;风险比[HR]:1.06,95%置信区间[CI]:1.03-1.09,p<0.01)和心房颤动(HR:1.19,95%CI:1.05-1.35,p<0.01)的风险显著更高,而在紧急冠状动脉血运重建(HR:1.07,95%CI:0.98-1.16,p=0.13)和中风(HR:0.96,95%CI:0.91-1.01,p=0.13)方面,非布司他与别嘌醇之间无显著差异。然而,基于随机对照试验,非布司他在急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF;HR:0.73,95%CI:0.35-1.53,p=0.40)和全因死亡(HR=0.86,95%CI:0.49-1.51,p=0.60)方面的结果差异没有统计学意义。在中国亚组中,与别嘌醇相比,非布司他可增加 ADHF(HR:1.22,95%CI:1.01-1.48,p<0.05)、心血管死亡(HR:1.25,95%CI:1.03-1.50,p<0.05)和全因死亡率(HR:1.07,95%CI:1.01-1.14,p<0.05)的风险。综上所述,与别嘌醇相比,在亚洲患者中使用非布司他与不良 CV 事件风险显著增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00e/10941583/e6ad1edd6d98/CTS-17-e13757-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验