Hartl DanaJ A M, Hans Stéphane, Vaissière Jacqueline, Brasnu DanielJ A M F
Voice, Biomaterials and Head and Neck Oncology Research Laboratory, CNRS-UPRESA 7018, University Paris V, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Apr;260(4):175-82. doi: 10.1007/s00405-002-0542-2. Epub 2002 Oct 18.
This study was designed to determine which objective acoustic or aerodynamic parameters allowed a homogeneous group of patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) to be distinguished from an age-matched and smoking-matched control group and to search for linear correlations between the objective parameters and the subjective breathiness ratings. Eight patients with recent-onset UVFP and 12 controls were prospectively studied. The acoustic parameters measured for the vowel /a/ at a comfortable frequency and intensity were: jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, cepstral peak prominence, the difference between the levels of the first two harmonics and the relative energy above 6 kHz. Aerodynamic parameters included the mean flow rate during a sustained /a/ and intraoral pressure during the production of the phoneme /pi/. The long-term average spectrum was calculated for 40 s of text, and the relative average energies in four frequency bands were compared. Six judges rated a mid-/a/ sample using a five-parameter scale with four levels of severity. Nonparametric statistical analysis revealed significant differences ( P<.05) between the UVFP group and the control group for 14 of the 19 parameters studied. Correlations between the objective parameters and perceived breathiness differed in the two groups. Correlations were not always as expected as based on previous literature reports. These measurements provided an objective qualification of voice in patients with UVFP and successfully distinguished them from the normal controls. The objective acoustic and aerodynamic measurements had generally low linear correlations with breathiness ratings in the control group. Higher correlations were seen in the UVFP group, in which breathiness was best correlated with airflow measurements.
本研究旨在确定哪些客观声学或空气动力学参数能够将一组单侧声带麻痹(UVFP)患者与年龄匹配且吸烟情况匹配的对照组区分开来,并寻找客观参数与主观呼吸音评级之间的线性相关性。对8例近期发病的UVFP患者和12例对照者进行了前瞻性研究。在舒适频率和强度下测量元音/a/的声学参数包括:抖动、闪烁、谐波噪声比、谐波峰值突出度、前两个谐波水平之间的差异以及6kHz以上的相对能量。空气动力学参数包括持续发/a/时的平均流速和发音素/pi/时的口腔内压力。计算40秒文本的长期平均频谱,并比较四个频带中的相对平均能量。6名评判员使用具有四个严重程度级别的五参数量表对一个/a/中间样本进行评分。非参数统计分析显示,在研究的19个参数中,UVFP组和对照组之间有14个存在显著差异(P<0.05)。两组中客观参数与感知呼吸音之间的相关性有所不同。相关性并不总是如先前文献报道所预期的那样。这些测量为UVFP患者的嗓音提供了客观的量化,并成功地将他们与正常对照组区分开来。客观声学和空气动力学测量与对照组呼吸音评级的线性相关性普遍较低。在UVFP组中观察到更高的相关性,其中呼吸音与气流测量的相关性最佳。