Jenkins Rob, Lavie Nilli, Driver Jon
Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):298-309. doi: 10.3758/bf03194801.
The extent to which famous distractor faces can be ignored was assessed in six experiments. Subjects categorized famous printed target names as those of pop stars or politicians, while attempting to ignore a flanking famous face distractor that could be congruent (e.g, a politician's name and face) or incongruent (e.g., a politician's name with a pop stars face). Congruency effects on reaction times indicated distractor intrusion. An additional, response-neutral flanker (neither pop star nor politician) could also be present. Congruency effects from the critical distractor face were reduced (diluted) by the presence of an intact anonymous face, but not by phase-shifted versions, inverted faces, or meaningful nonface objects. By contrast, congruency effects from other types of distracting objects (musical instruments, fruits), when printed names for these classes were categorized, were diluted equivalently by intact faces, phase-shifted faces, or meaningful nonface objects. Our results suggest that distractor faces act differently from other types of distractors, suffering from only face-specific capacity limits.
在六个实验中评估了对著名干扰面孔的忽略程度。受试者将著名的印刷目标名字归类为流行明星或政治家的名字,同时试图忽略一个侧翼的著名面孔干扰物,该干扰物可能是一致的(例如,一个政治家的名字和面孔)或不一致的(例如,一个政治家的名字与一个流行明星的面孔)。一致性对反应时间的影响表明了干扰物的侵入。还可能存在一个额外的、与反应无关的侧翼干扰物(既不是流行明星也不是政治家)。关键干扰面孔的一致性效应会因完整的匿名面孔的存在而降低(减弱),但不会因相移版本、倒置面孔或有意义的非面孔物体而降低。相比之下,当对这些类别的印刷名称进行分类时,来自其他类型干扰物体(乐器、水果)的一致性效应会被完整面孔、相移面孔或有意义的非面孔物体同等程度地减弱。我们的结果表明,干扰面孔的行为与其他类型的干扰物不同,仅受到特定于面孔的能力限制。