Johnson B L, Adamczyk J W, Tennoe K O, Stromme S B
Med Sci Sports. 1976 Spring;8(1):35-8.
Eight male university students served as subjects in an investigation designed to develop strength using two different muscle training routines over a six week period. The subjects trained the arm and leg on one side of their bodies using concentric contractions and the arm and leg on the opposite side of their bodies with identical exercises using eccentric contractions. Concentric movements were against a resistance 80% of one-repetition-maximum (1-Rm) for 10 repetitions and two sets; eccentric movements were against a force of 120% of concentric 1-RM for 6 repetitions and two sets. Both routines produced significant gains in strength in all subjects, but neither training procedure produced dynamic or static strength gains significantly different from the other. Subjective evaluations by the subjects indicated that the eccentric training movements were easier to perform than the concentric training movements.
八名男大学生作为受试者参与了一项调查,该调查旨在通过在六周时间内使用两种不同的肌肉训练方案来增强力量。受试者使用向心收缩训练身体一侧的手臂和腿部,并用相同的练习、离心收缩训练身体另一侧的手臂和腿部。向心运动是对抗相当于一次最大重复量(1-Rm)80%的阻力,进行10次重复,共两组;离心运动是对抗相当于向心1-RM 120%的力量,进行6次重复,共两组。两种训练方案都使所有受试者的力量有显著提高,但两种训练方法在动态或静态力量增长方面均未产生显著差异。受试者的主观评价表明,离心训练动作比向心训练动作更容易完成。