Suppr超能文献

对17RVPDB - CO₂和17RVSMOW绝对值的重新测定。

A redetermination of absolute values for 17RVPDB-CO2 and 17RVSMOW.

作者信息

Assonov Sergey S, Brenninkmeijer Carl A M

机构信息

Air Chemistry Division, Max Planck Institute of Chemistry, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17(10):1017-29. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1011.

Abstract

In a companion paper in this issue we presented a review of the current state of (17)O-corrections for CO(2) mass spectrometry and considered an approach (including algebraic formulae) of how to determine absolute values for (17)R(VPDB-CO2) and (17)R(VSMOW). Here we present the results of experiments conducted to determine these values. Two oxygen gases (one depleted in heavy isotopes and the other isotopically normal oxygen) were analysed to obtain the relative (17)O content. Samples of both gases were converted into CO(2), and the resulting CO(2) samples were analysed as well. Possible experimental and analytical errors are carefully considered and eliminated as far as feasible. Much attention was paid to understanding and dealing with cross-contamination effects occurring in the mass spectrometer. Based on the data obtained, the absolute values are calculated to be: (17)R(VPDB-CO2) = 0.00039511 +/- 0.00000094 and (17)R(VSMOW) = 0.00038672 +/- 0.00000087 (expanded uncertainties). Both values are on the original scale of Craig (Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1957; 12: 133-149) with (13)R(VPDB-CO2) = 0.0112372. A (17)O-correction algorithm incorporating the newly determined value for (17)R(VPDB-CO2) and lambda = 0.528 by Meijer and Li (Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 1998; 34: 349-369) is constructed. A computational test is performed to demonstrate the degree of delta(13)C bias relative to the previously known correction algorithms. delta(13)C values produced by the constructed algorithm are in the middle of the values produced by the other algorithms. We refrain, however, from giving any recommendation concerning which (17)O-correction algorithm to use in order to obtain delta(13)C data in the most accurate way. The present work illuminates the need to reconsider recommendations concerning the correction algorithm.

摘要

在本期的一篇配套论文中,我们对二氧化碳质谱法的(17)O校正现状进行了综述,并考虑了一种确定(17)R(VPDB - CO2)和(17)R(VSMOW)绝对值的方法(包括代数公式)。在此,我们展示了为确定这些值而进行的实验结果。分析了两种氧气(一种重同位素贫化,另一种为同位素正常的氧气)以获得相对(17)O含量。两种气体的样品都被转化为CO2,并对所得的CO2样品也进行了分析。仔细考虑并尽可能消除了可能的实验和分析误差。高度重视理解和处理质谱仪中出现的交叉污染效应。根据获得的数据,计算出的绝对值为:(17)R(VPDB - CO2)= 0.00039511 ± 0.00000094,(17)R(VSMOW)= 0.00038672 ± 0.00000087(扩展不确定度)。这两个值都基于Craig的原始标度(《地球化学与宇宙化学学报》1957年;12:133 - 149),其中(13)R(VPDB - CO2)= 0.0112372。构建了一种结合新确定的(17)R(VPDB - CO2)值和Meijer与Li(《同位素环境健康研究》1998年;34:349 - 369)给出的λ = 0.528的(17)O校正算法。进行了一项计算测试,以证明相对于先前已知的校正算法,δ(13)C偏差的程度。所构建算法产生的δ(13)C值处于其他算法产生的值的中间。然而,我们并不就为了以最准确的方式获得δ(13)C数据而使用哪种(17)O校正算法给出任何建议。当前的工作表明有必要重新考虑关于校正算法的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验