Schultz Marcus J, de Jonge Evert, Kesecioglu Jozef
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2003 Apr;7(2):107-10. doi: 10.1186/cc1873. Epub 2003 Jan 24.
Several emotional responses may be invoked in critical care physicians when confronted with selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD). Although recent meta-analyses have shown that the use of SDD reduces the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and improves ICU survival, the effectiveness of SDD has remained controversial. We recently concluded a large randomized, controlled trial on the use of SDD that showed improved survival of ICU patients treated with SDD. A second concern regarding use of SDD has been the fear for the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Interestingly, a recently published study did not confirm this fear, and our recently finished study even demonstrated a decline in colonization with a and enterobacteriaceae that were resistant against tobramycin, ceftazidime, imipenem and ciprofloxacin. The hopes are that this study will at long last end the debate about the efficacy and safety of SDD in critically ill patients.
当面对消化道选择性去污(SDD)时,重症监护医生可能会产生几种情绪反应。尽管最近的荟萃分析表明,使用SDD可降低呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率并提高重症监护病房(ICU)的生存率,但SDD的有效性仍存在争议。我们最近完成了一项关于使用SDD的大型随机对照试验,结果显示接受SDD治疗的ICU患者生存率有所提高。关于使用SDD的另一个担忧是对抗菌素耐药性出现的恐惧。有趣的是,最近发表的一项研究并未证实这一担忧,而我们最近完成的研究甚至表明,对妥布霉素、头孢他啶、亚胺培南和环丙沙星耐药的α和肠杆菌科细菌的定植有所减少。人们希望这项研究最终能结束关于SDD在重症患者中疗效和安全性的争论。