Westfall Catherine
Department of History, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48864, USA.
Isis. 2003 Mar;94(1):30-56. doi: 10.1086/376098.
Historians of science have tended to focus exclusively on scale in investigations of largescale research, perhaps because it has been easy to assume that comprehending a phenomenon dubbed "Big Science" hinges on an understanding of bigness. A close look at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory's Bevalac, a medium-scale "mezzo science" project formed by uniting two preexisting machines--the modest SuperHILAC and the grand Bevatron--shows what can be gained by overcoming this preoccupation with bigness. The Bevalac story reveals how interconnections, connections, and disconnections ultimately led to the development of a new kind of science that transformed the landscape of large-scale research in the United States. Important lessons in historiography also emerge: the value of framing discussions in terms of networks, the necessity of constantly expanding and refining methodology, and the importance of avoiding the rhetoric of participants and instead finding words to tell our own stories.
科学史学家在对大规模研究的调查中往往只专注于规模,这或许是因为人们很容易认为,理解一种被称为“大科学”的现象取决于对规模大小的理解。仔细审视劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室的贝伐粒子加速器,这是一个通过将两台现有的机器——规模较小的超级重离子直线加速器和大型的贝伐加速器——联合起来而形成的中等规模“中观科学”项目,就能看出克服这种对规模大小的执念会带来什么收获。贝伐粒子加速器的故事揭示了相互联系、联系以及脱节最终是如何导致一种新型科学的发展,而这种科学改变了美国大规模研究的局面。史学研究中的重要经验教训也随之浮现:以网络的视角构建讨论的价值、不断扩展和完善方法论的必要性,以及避免使用参与者的言辞,而是找到属于我们自己的表达方式来讲述故事的重要性。