Dusenbury Linda, Brannigan Rosalind, Falco Mathea, Hansen William B
Tanglewood Research, 7700 Albert Pick Road, Suite D, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):237-56. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237.
To help inform drug abuse prevention research in school settings about the issues surrounding implementation, we conducted a review of the fidelity of implementation research literature spanning a 25-year period. Fidelity has been measured in five ways: (1) adherence, (2) dose, (3) quality of program delivery, (4) participant responsiveness and (5) program differentiation. Definitions and measures of fidelity were found not to be consistent across studies, and new definitions are proposed. While there has been limited research on fidelity of implementation in the social sciences, research in drug abuse prevention provides evidence that poor implementation is likely to result in a loss of program effectiveness. Studies indicate that most teachers do not cover everything in a curriculum, they are likely to teach less over time and training alone is not sufficient to ensure fidelity of implementation. Key elements of high fidelity include teacher training, program characteristics, teacher characteristics and organizational characteristics. The review concludes with a discussion of the tension between fidelity and reinvention/adaptation, and ways of resolving this tension. Recommendations are made for developing a consistent methodology for measuring and analyzing fidelity of implementation. Further, researchers and providers should collaborate to develop ways of introducing flexibility into prevention programs.
为了让学校环境中的药物滥用预防研究了解围绕实施的相关问题,我们对25年间实施保真度研究文献进行了综述。保真度通过五种方式进行衡量:(1)依从性,(2)剂量,(3)项目实施质量,(4)参与者反应性以及(5)项目差异性。研究发现,保真度的定义和衡量方法在不同研究中并不一致,并提出了新的定义。虽然社会科学领域关于实施保真度的研究有限,但药物滥用预防研究提供了证据表明,实施不力可能会导致项目效果丧失。研究表明,大多数教师不会讲授课程中的所有内容,随着时间推移他们讲授的内容可能会减少,而且仅靠培训不足以确保实施的保真度。高保真度的关键要素包括教师培训、项目特征、教师特征和组织特征。综述最后讨论了保真度与重新设计/调整之间的矛盾以及解决这一矛盾的方法。针对制定衡量和分析实施保真度的一致方法提出了建议。此外,研究人员和提供者应合作开发在预防项目中引入灵活性的方法。