• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的学校物质使用预防实践:现实条件下的实施保真度。

Evidence-based practice in school substance use prevention: fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2011 Apr;26(2):361-71. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr013. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyr013
PMID:21382882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3061047/
Abstract

Fidelity of program implementation under real-world conditions is a critical issue in the dissemination of evidence-based school substance use prevention curricula. Program effects are diminished when programs are implemented with poor fidelity. We assessed five domains of fidelity--adherence, exposure (dosage), quality of delivery, participant responsiveness and program differentiation (lack of contamination from other programs)--in a subset of respondents (N = 342) from a national random sample of public schools with middle school grades (N = 1721). Respondents taught 1 of 10 evidence-based universal substance use prevention programs as their primary program during the 2004-05 school year. Their responses to survey questions about their recent implementation practices indicated that fidelity was high for quality of delivery and participant responsiveness, low for program differentiation and modest for adherence and exposure--the two core domains of fidelity. Results suggest the need for continued emphasis on fidelity in program materials, trainings and on-going technical support. Particular attention should be paid to supporting use of interactive delivery strategies.

摘要

在现实条件下,计划执行的保真度是传播基于证据的学校物质使用预防课程的一个关键问题。当计划执行的保真度较差时,计划效果会降低。我们评估了五个保真度领域——依从性、暴露(剂量)、交付质量、参与者响应性和计划差异化(缺乏来自其他计划的污染)——在一个全国公立学校随机样本的一部分受访者(N=342)中,这些受访者在 2004-05 学年教授了 10 种基于证据的通用物质使用预防计划中的 1 种作为其主要计划。他们对最近实施实践的调查问题的回答表明,交付质量和参与者响应性的保真度很高,计划差异化的保真度较低,依从性和暴露(保真度的两个核心领域)的保真度适中。结果表明,需要继续强调计划材料、培训和持续技术支持中的保真度。特别应该注意支持使用互动式交付策略。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based practice in school substance use prevention: fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions.基于证据的学校物质使用预防实践:现实条件下的实施保真度。
Health Educ Res. 2011 Apr;26(2):361-71. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr013. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
2
Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation's middle schools.与美国中学预防药物使用课程指南的忠实度相关的因素。
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Jun;30(3):375-91. doi: 10.1177/1090198103030003010.
3
Typology of delivery quality: latent profile analysis of teacher engagement and delivery techniques in a school-based prevention intervention, keepin' it REAL curriculum.交付质量的类型学:对一项基于学校的预防干预措施“保持真实”课程中教师参与度和交付技巧的潜在剖面分析
Health Educ Res. 2014 Dec;29(6):897-905. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu061. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
4
The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools.美国中学有效物质使用预防课程的普及情况。
Prev Sci. 2002 Dec;3(4):257-65. doi: 10.1023/a:1020872424136.
5
A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.实施保真度研究综述:对学校环境中药物滥用预防的启示
Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):237-56. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237.
6
Implementing evidence-based substance use prevention curricula with fidelity: the role of teacher training.以保真度实施基于证据的物质使用预防课程:教师培训的作用。
J Drug Educ. 2009;39(1):39-58. doi: 10.2190/DE.39.1.c.
7
Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of Reconnecting Youth.“重新联结青年”治疗效果试验中的实施保真度
Health Educ Res. 2007 Feb;22(1):95-107. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl052. Epub 2006 Jun 28.
8
A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings.将当前基于学校的物质使用预防计划的实践与荟萃分析结果进行比较。
Prev Sci. 2003 Mar;4(1):1-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1021777109369.
9
Implementation evaluation of the Blueprint multi-component drug prevention programme: fidelity of school component delivery.“蓝图”多成分药物预防项目的实施评估:学校部分实施的保真度
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Nov;26(6):653-64. doi: 10.1080/09595230701613809.
10
Influence of Classroom-Level Factors on Implementation Fidelity During Scale-up of Evidence-Based Interventions.课堂层面因素对基于证据的干预措施推广过程中实施保真度的影响。
Prev Sci. 2022 Aug;23(6):969-981. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01375-3. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of using real-world data to emulate substance use disorder clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.利用真实世界数据模拟物质使用障碍临床试验的可行性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02307-1.
2
Acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of the culturally adapted version of Unplugged ("Yo Se Lo Que Quiero"), a substance use preventive program among adolescents in Chile: a pilot randomized controlled study.在智利青少年中进行文化适应性改编的“Unplugged(Yo Se Lo Que Quiero)”(一个物质使用预防计划)的可接受性、可行性和保真度:一项试点随机对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):2026. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19499-2.
3
Fidelity of D.A.R.E. Officers' Delivery of "keepin' it REAL" in Elementary & Middle School.“保持真实”在小学和中学的 D.A.R.E. 官员的实施效果。
Prev Sci. 2023 Jul;24(5):985-998. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01548-8. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Effectiveness of a hybrid digital substance abuse prevention approach combining e-Learning and in-person class sessions.一种结合电子学习和面对面课程的混合式数字药物滥用预防方法的有效性。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 3;4:931276. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.931276. eCollection 2022.
5
Styles of Adaptation: The Impact of Frequency and Valence of Adaptation on Preventing Substance Use.适应方式:适应的频率和效价对预防物质使用的影响
Health Educ (Lond). 2013;113(4):345-363. doi: 10.1108/09654281311329268. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
6
Comparing standard versus enhanced implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program among Bahamian sixth grade students: findings from nationwide implementation trials.比较巴哈马六年级学生中基于证据的艾滋病毒预防方案的标准与强化实施情况:全国实施试验结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):1442. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13848-9.
7
Dosage in Implementation of an Effective School-Based Health Program Impacts Youth Health Risk Behaviors and Experiences.在实施有效的基于学校的健康计划时,剂量会影响青少年的健康风险行为和体验。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Sep;71(3):334-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
8
Adherence of HIV clinics to guidelines for the delivery of TB screening among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ghana.加纳艾滋病毒诊所遵守向艾滋病毒感染者/艾滋病患者提供结核病筛查服务的准则情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):1110. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07121-9.
9
Fidelity of implementation of TB screening guidelines by health providers at selected HIV clinics in Ghana.在加纳的选定 HIV 诊所,卫生保健提供者对结核病筛查指南的实施一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0257486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257486. eCollection 2021.
10
The need and opportunity to expand substance use disorder treatment in school-based settings.在学校环境中扩大物质使用障碍治疗的需求和机遇。
Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2014;7(2):75-87. doi: 10.1080/1754730x.2014.888221. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The prevalence of evidence-based drug use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools in 2008.2008 年美国中学中基于证据的药物使用预防课程的流行情况。
Prev Sci. 2011 Mar;12(1):63-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0184-3.
2
Implementation fidelity: the experience of the Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study.实施保真度:青少年药物滥用预防研究的经验
Health Educ Res. 2009 Jun;24(3):394-406. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn035. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
3
Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.实施至关重要:关于实施对项目成果的影响以及影响实施的因素的研究综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
4
Implementing the LifeSkills Training drug prevention program: factors related to implementation fidelity.实施生活技能培训药物预防计划:与实施保真度相关的因素。
Implement Sci. 2008 Jan 18;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-5.
5
Implementation evaluation of the Blueprint multi-component drug prevention programme: fidelity of school component delivery.“蓝图”多成分药物预防项目的实施评估:学校部分实施的保真度
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Nov;26(6):653-64. doi: 10.1080/09595230701613809.
6
Fidelity of implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): a comparison of classroom teachers and program specialists.“无药物滥用项目”(TND)中的实施保真度:课堂教师与项目专家的比较
Prev Sci. 2007 Jun;8(2):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0056-z. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
7
An evaluation of the fidelity of implementation of a school-based drug abuse prevention program: project toward no drug abuse (TND).一项针对以学校为基础的药物滥用预防计划(“无药物滥用项目”,即TND)实施保真度的评估。
J Drug Educ. 2005;35(4):305-29. doi: 10.2190/4LKJ-NQ7Y-PU2A-X1BK.
8
Type II translation: transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings.二类转化:将预防干预措施从研究环境推广至现实环境。
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Sep;29(3):302-33. doi: 10.1177/0163278706290408.
9
Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions.实施质量:制定对于理解预防性干预措施传播至关重要的衡量标准。
Health Educ Res. 2005 Jun;20(3):308-13. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg134. Epub 2004 Nov 2.
10
Program provider and observer ratings of school-based preventive intervention implementation: agreement and relation to youth outcomes.基于学校的预防性干预实施的项目提供者和观察者评级:一致性及与青少年结果的关系。
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):242-57. doi: 10.1177/1090198103260514.