Becker Gay, Beyene Yewoubdar, Newsom Edwina, Mayen Nury
Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0646, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 May;58(3):S151-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/58.3.s151.
Our purpose is to examine how culture-specific conceptions of mutual assistance in four ethnic groups reflect the nature of social exchange and its role in creating continuity.
We conducted five in-depth interviews over a 5-year period with 270 respondents aged 50 and up (59 African Americans, 85 Latinos, 78 Filipino Americans, and 48 Cambodian Americans). We asked both open-ended and semistructured questions to determine how respondents viewed their role in mutual assistance in the family.
Mutual assistance was a critical element in intergenerational relations in all four groups, as it represented continuity within the family and was a part of a broader cultural ethos of family relationships. There were differences between groups in overall approach to mutual assistance, the factors to which they assigned the greatest importance, and the degree of dissatisfaction expressed over family relationships.
Social exchange can be viewed not only as a means by which those who are old maintain power but as a major vehicle for perpetuating continuity across the generations. When social exchange breaks down, elders suffer from loss of power as expressed through role loss. Elders must have a negotiable commodity to exchange as well as the flexibility to adjust to changes in the extended family. Maintaining continuity of the family in the face of disruptive threats poses a particular challenge for elders.
我们的目的是研究四个种族群体中特定文化背景下的互助观念如何反映社会交换的本质及其在创造延续性方面的作用。
我们在5年时间里对270名年龄在50岁及以上的受访者进行了5次深度访谈(59名非裔美国人、85名拉丁裔、78名菲律宾裔美国人以及48名柬埔寨裔美国人)。我们提出了开放式和半结构化问题,以确定受访者如何看待自己在家庭互助中的角色。
互助是所有四个群体代际关系中的关键要素,因为它代表了家庭内部的延续性,并且是更广泛的家庭关系文化精神的一部分。各群体在互助的总体方式、他们认为最重要的因素以及对家庭关系表达的不满程度方面存在差异。
社会交换不仅可以被视为老年人维持权力的一种手段,而且可以被视为跨代延续的主要载体。当社会交换破裂时,老年人会因角色丧失而遭受权力丧失之苦。老年人必须有一种可协商交换的商品,以及适应大家庭变化的灵活性。面对破坏性威胁时维持家庭的延续性对老年人构成了特殊挑战。