Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
作者信息
Katz G A
机构信息
Harvard Law School, USA.
出版信息
Harv J Law Technol. 1998 Summer;11(3):683-98.
PMID:12731553
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.帕尔帕莱克斯诉法国生育保护中心：生殖技术中的意图保护
Harv J Law Technol. 1998 Summer;11(3):683-98.
2
Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent?
Drake Law Rev. 2004 Winter;52(2):331-62.
3
A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.死后受孕及辅助生殖相关问题入门
Washburn Law J. 1999 Spring;38(2):599-654.
4
Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent.冷冻胚胎：对“强制为人父母”的回应及意图的作用。
Fam Law Q. 2005 Fall;39(3):663-81.
5
Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership.混乱的遗传谱系与基因所有权的荒谬性。
Harv J Law Technol. 1998 Summer;11(3):593-618.
6
Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies.辅助生殖技术：合同、同意书与争议
Am J Fam Law. 2005 Winter;18(4):193-9.
7
The real sexual revolution: posthumously conceived children.真正的性革命：死后受孕的孩子。
St Johns Law Rev. 1999 Summer;73(3):857-931.
8
9
Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies.生死攸关之事：生殖技术的遗传后果
Hofstra Law Rev. 1997 Summer;25(4):1091-220.
10
In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny.关于布赞卡的婚姻案：开创全新命运
West State Univ Law Rev. 1998;26:25-45.
引用本文的文献
1
Post-mortem Reproduction from a Vietnamese Perspective-an Analysis and Commentary.从越南视角看死后生殖——一项分析与评论
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Aug 6;12(3):257-288. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00137-z. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Zotero 插件