• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥德堡乳房筛查试验

The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.

作者信息

Bjurstam Nils, Björneld Lena, Warwick Jane, Sala Evis, Duffy Stephen W, Nyström Lennarth, Walker Neil, Cahlin Erling, Eriksson Olof, Hafström Lars-Olof, Lingaas Halvard, Mattsson Jan, Persson Stellan, Rudenstam Carl-Magnus, Salander Håkan, Säve-Söderbergh Johan, Wahlin Torkel

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Center for Breast Imaging, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2387-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11361.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.11361
PMID:12733136
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is evidence for a reduction in breast carcinoma mortality with mammographic screening, some doubts have been expressed, and there is still uncertainty regarding the age specific effects.

METHODS

The authors report on a randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening for breast carcinoma that was conducted among 51,611 women (21,650 women who were invited to a screening [the study group] and 29,961 women in a control group) ages 39-59 years in Gothenburg, Sweden. Among women in the study group, the screening interval was 18 months. The screening phase of the trial took place in 1982-1991, and follow-up for breast carcinoma mortality continued until December 31, 1996. Mortality from breast carcinoma was analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Overall and age specific effects of invitation to mammography screening on breast carcinoma mortality were calculated. Three mortality effects were estimated: the effect on deaths from breast tumors diagnosed during the screening phase of the trial, as assessed by an independent Endpoint Committee (the EPC evaluation model); the effect on deaths from breast carcinoma diagnosed during the screening phase of the trial, as determined by data from the National Cancer Registry and the National Cause of Death Register (the SCB evaluation model); and the effect on deaths from all breast carcinomas diagnosed up to December 31, 1996, as determined by the National Cancer Registry and the National Cause of Death Register (the SCB follow-up model).

RESULTS

A nonsignificant, 21% reduction in the rate of mortality from breast carcinoma with invitation to screening was observed using the EPC evaluation model (relative risk [RR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.58-1.08; P = 0.14); and a borderline significant, 23% rate reduction was observed using the SCB follow-up model (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-1.00; P = 0.05). Age specific analyses yielded greater mortality rate reductions for the groups of women ages 39-44 years, 45-49 years, and 55-59 years, but there was no mortality rate reduction in the group of women ages 50-54 years. The effects of invitation to mammographic screening on the incidence of lymph node-positive disease closely paralleled the effects of invitation on breast carcinoma mortality. The effect on breast carcinoma mortality was consistent with the effect on all-cause mortality, suggesting no bias in classification of cause of death. Breast carcinoma incidence in the study group was almost identical to the incidence in the control group after trial by screening had ended in the control group (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.09; P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The current results support the commonly observed 20-30% reduction in breast carcinoma mortality with invitation to screening. The impression that screening is less effective in women younger than 50 years may be an oversimplification. Age specific effects should be a target for further research.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明乳腺钼靶筛查可降低乳腺癌死亡率,但仍存在一些疑虑,且关于年龄特异性影响仍存在不确定性。

方法

作者报告了一项在瑞典哥德堡对51611名年龄在39至59岁的女性进行的乳腺癌钼靶筛查随机对照试验(21650名被邀请参加筛查的女性[研究组]和29961名对照组女性)。研究组女性的筛查间隔为18个月。试验的筛查阶段于1982年至1991年进行,乳腺癌死亡率的随访持续至1996年12月31日。使用泊松回归模型分析乳腺癌死亡率。计算了邀请进行钼靶筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的总体和年龄特异性影响。估计了三种死亡率影响:对试验筛查阶段诊断出的乳腺肿瘤死亡的影响,由独立的终点委员会评估(EPC评估模型);对试验筛查阶段诊断出的乳腺癌死亡的影响,由国家癌症登记处和国家死亡原因登记处的数据确定(SCB评估模型);以及对截至199年12月31日诊断出的所有乳腺癌死亡的影响,由国家癌症登记处和国家死亡原因登记处确定(SCB随访模型)。

结果

使用EPC评估模型观察到,邀请筛查使乳腺癌死亡率有21%的降低,但无统计学意义(相对风险[RR],0.79;95%置信区间[95%CI],0.58 - 1.08;P = 0.14);使用SCB随访模型观察到有临界显著的23%的降低率(RR,0.77;95%CI,0.60 - 1.00;P = 0.05)。年龄特异性分析显示,39至44岁、45至49岁和55至59岁的女性组死亡率降低幅度更大,但50至54岁的女性组死亡率没有降低。邀请进行钼靶筛查对淋巴结阳性疾病发病率的影响与对乳腺癌死亡率的影响密切平行。对乳腺癌死亡率的影响与对全因死亡率的影响一致,表明死亡原因分类无偏差。在对照组筛查试验结束后,研究组的乳腺癌发病率与对照组几乎相同(RR,0.98;95%CI,0.88 - 1.09;P = 0.7)。

结论

目前的结果支持通常观察到的邀请筛查使乳腺癌死亡率降低20%至30%的情况。认为筛查对50岁以下女性效果较差的印象可能过于简单化。年龄特异性影响应成为进一步研究的目标。

相似文献

1
The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.哥德堡乳房筛查试验
Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2387-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11361.
2
The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.瑞典七个郡有组织的乳腺钼靶筛查服务对乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
Cancer. 2002 Aug 1;95(3):458-69. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765.
3
Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.基于人群的亚洲女性乳腺癌筛查患病率及检测随机试验的中间测量结果:新加坡乳腺癌筛查项目
Cancer. 1998 Apr 15;82(8):1521-8.
4
Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.瑞典北部乳腺钼靶筛查服务:对乳腺癌死亡率的影响——最新情况
J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):87-93. doi: 10.1258/096914107781261918.
5
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.1991年4月至1997年3月哥本哈根乳腺癌的乳腺X线筛查。乳腺X线筛查评估小组。
APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44.
6
Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku.在图尔库,乳腺钼靶筛查服务降低了老年女性的乳腺癌死亡率。
J Med Screen. 2006;13(1):34-40. doi: 10.1258/096914106776179845.
7
Effect of mammographic service screening on stage at presentation of breast cancers in Sweden.瑞典乳腺钼靶筛查服务对乳腺癌确诊时分期的影响。
Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2205-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22671.
8
The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?乳腺癌的自然史:我们从筛查中学到了什么?
Cancer. 1999 Aug 1;86(3):449-62.
9
The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.服务筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008 Aug;17(4):306-11. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f0c0cc.
10
The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization.哥德堡乳腺筛查试验:随机分组时年龄在39 - 49岁女性的死亡率、发病率及检测方式的初步结果。
Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11):2091-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Thirty years of population-based breast cancer screening in Iceland: a comparison of quality indicators and tumour characteristics between women aged 40-49 and 50-69 years.冰岛三十年基于人群的乳腺癌筛查:40 - 49岁与50 - 69岁女性质量指标和肿瘤特征比较
Acta Oncol. 2025 Aug 14;64:1061-1070. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44090.
2
Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment.乳腺钼靶筛查随机和观察性研究中的自我选择偏倚:定量评估
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 1;17:441-450. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S515464. eCollection 2025.
3
Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.
乳腺癌筛查:为为加拿大预防性医疗保健指南提供信息而进行的系统评价更新
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02700-3.
4
Impact of Transfer Learning Using Local Data on Performance of a Deep Learning Model for Screening Mammography.利用本地数据的迁移学习对用于筛查乳房 X 光照片的深度学习模型性能的影响。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Jul;6(4):e230383. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230383.
5
Behaviour within a Clinical Trial and Implications for Mammography Guidelines.临床试验中的行为及其对乳腺钼靶检查指南的影响。
Rev Econ Stud. 2023 Jan;90(1):432-462. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdac022. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
The age-specific differences in histopathological tumor characteristics and TNM classification of breast carcinomas in Quality assured mamma diagnostic (QuaMaDi) program in the state of Schleswig-Holstein in Germany.德国石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州质量保证乳房诊断(QuaMaDi)计划中乳腺癌的组织病理学肿瘤特征和 TNM 分类的年龄特异性差异。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;148(2):387-400. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03841-x. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
7
Mammograms and Mortality: How Has the Evidence Evolved?乳房X光检查与死亡率:证据是如何演变的?
J Econ Perspect. 2021 Spring;35(2):119-140. doi: 10.1257/jep.35.2.119.
8
Detection rate of breast malignancy of needle localization biopsy of breast microcalcification.乳腺微小钙化灶针定位活检的乳腺恶性肿瘤检出率
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Mar 22;33(3):275-281. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_191_20. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
9
Screening and Selection: The Case of Mammograms.筛查与选择:乳房X光检查的案例
Am Econ Rev. 2020 Dec;110(12):3836-3870. doi: 10.1257/aer.20191191.
10
A Review of Breast Imaging for Timely Diagnosis of Disease.乳腺影像学检查在疾病及时诊断中的应用评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 21;18(11):5509. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115509.