Suppr超能文献

使用半腱肌和股薄肌腱、骨髌腱或股四头肌肌腱移植物进行前交叉韧带重建,采用压配固定且无金属硬件。一种全新且创新的手术方法。

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, bone patellar tendon, or quadriceps tendon-graft with press-fit fixation without hardware. A new and innovative procedure.

作者信息

Paessler Hans H, Mastrokalos Dimitrios S

机构信息

Center for Knee and Foot Surgery and Sport Injuries, ATOS-Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstrasse 9-15, Heidelberg 69115, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Jan;34(1):49-64. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00070-6.

Abstract

BONE--PATELLAR TENDON: The "no hardware" technique for ACL reconstruction is a new method that offers many advantages and is straightforward to perform. Its main innovative feature is that it does not require bone-block harvesting from the patella. This reduces donor site morbidity and prevents patellar fractures. The bone tunnels are made using tube harvesters and compaction drilling. This minimizes trauma and obviates the risk of bone necrosis. The articular entrance of the tibial tunnel is completely occupied by the grafts. This prevents a windshield-wiper effect and synovial fluid ingress into the tunnel, and enhances graft incorporation. The fact that no hardware is used with both patellar tendon or hamstring grafts significantly reduces the overall cost of the operation and facilitates revision surgery. The quadriceps tendon is also a very good graft. It is thick and has good biomechanical properties and low donor site morbidity. Its disadvantages are: weakness of quadriceps after the operation, an unsightly scar, and some difficulty in graft harvesting [58]. Also, postoperative MRI is not fraught with the problem of metal artifacts. It is difficult to decide which of the methods currently available for ACL reconstruction is the best because most of them give satisfactory results. In the future, assessments of knee ligament reconstruction techniques should look at long-term stability combined with low complication rates. Ease of revision surgery and low cost should also be taken into consideration, given the large annual volume of knee ligament reconstructions (50,000 in the United States alone) [59]. We believe that our technique addresses most of these issues, and that it constitutes a useful alternative method for ACL reconstruction. SEMITENDINOSUS--GRACILIS: This technique, which was used with 915 patients from June 1998 to February 2002, shows a particularly low rate of postoperative morbidity. The reason is probably to be found in the "waterproofing" of the bone tunnels, which lead to less postoperative bleeding and swelling. No drains were used. Rehabilitation follows the same protocol as used for the reconstruction using patellar tendon grafts (accelerated/functional). As expected, there was no widening of the femoral tunnels and little widening of the tibial tunnels. Interestingly, tibial tunnel enlargement was significantly less in a nonaccelarated rehabilitation group than in the accelerated group [60] without affecting stability. The measured internal torque of the hamstrings, as well as their flexion force, already had returned to normal 12 months postoperatively. In a prospective randomized (unpublished) study comparing this technique with ACL reconstruction with BPT grafts with medial or lateral third with only one bone plug (from the tibial tuberosity, see technique described above), we found no significant difference between both groups in subjective scores, stability, KT-1000 values, Tegner activity score, and IKDC at 1-year follow-up. Only the results of kneeling and knee walking testing were significantly better in the hamstring group [61]. In summary, the advantages of this presented technique are: (1) the knot of the graft is close proximally to the anatomic site of the insertion of the ACL, thus avoiding the Bungee effect.; (2) the press-fit tunnel fixation prevents synovial fluid entering the bone tunnels, windshield-wiper effect, and longitudinal motion within the tunnel; the intensive contact between the bony wall of the tunnel and graft collagen over a long distance without any suture material results in quick and complete graft incorporation; and (3) no fixation material means no hardware problems, facilitates revision surgery, and lowers overall costs.

摘要

骨-髌腱:前交叉韧带重建的“无金属植入物”技术是一种具有诸多优势且操作简便的新方法。其主要创新点在于无需从髌骨获取骨块。这降低了供区并发症的发生率,并防止了髌骨骨折。骨隧道采用套管采集器和压实钻孔技术制作。这将创伤降至最低,并消除了骨坏死的风险。胫骨隧道的关节入口完全被移植物占据。这可防止“雨刮器效应”和滑液进入隧道,并促进移植物的融合。使用髌腱或腘绳肌移植物时不使用金属植入物这一事实显著降低了手术的总体成本,并便于翻修手术。股四头肌肌腱也是一种非常好的移植物。它厚实,具有良好的生物力学性能,且供区并发症发生率低。其缺点是:术后股四头肌无力、瘢痕不美观以及移植物采集存在一定困难[58]。此外,术后磁共振成像不存在金属伪影问题。很难确定目前用于前交叉韧带重建的哪种方法是最佳的,因为大多数方法都能给出令人满意的结果。未来,对膝关节韧带重建技术的评估应着眼于长期稳定性以及低并发症发生率。鉴于每年膝关节韧带重建的数量众多(仅在美国就有50,000例)[59],还应考虑翻修手术的简便性和低成本。我们认为我们的技术解决了这些问题中的大部分,并且它构成了一种有用的前交叉韧带重建替代方法。

半腱肌-股薄肌:1998年6月至2002年2月期间,915例患者采用了该技术,术后并发症发生率特别低。原因可能在于骨隧道的“防水”处理,这导致术后出血和肿胀较少。未使用引流管。康复方案与使用髌腱移植物进行重建时相同(加速/功能康复)。正如预期的那样,股骨隧道没有增宽,胫骨隧道增宽也很少。有趣的是,在非加速康复组中,胫骨隧道扩大明显少于加速康复组[但不影响稳定性][60]。术后12个月,测量的腘绳肌内扭矩及其屈曲力已恢复正常。在一项前瞻性随机(未发表)研究中,将该技术与使用带内侧或外侧三分之一且仅带有一个骨栓(来自胫骨结节,见上述技术)的双束髌腱移植物进行前交叉韧带重建进行比较,我们发现两组在主观评分、稳定性、KT - 1000值、Tegner活动评分和1年随访时的国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分方面没有显著差异。仅在腘绳肌组中,跪姿和膝关节行走测试的结果明显更好[61]总之,该技术的优点是:(1)移植物的结在近端靠近前交叉韧带插入的解剖部位,从而避免了“蹦极效应”;(2)压配合隧道固定可防止滑液进入骨隧道、“雨刮器效应”以及隧道内的纵向运动;隧道骨壁与移植物胶原蛋白在长距离内紧密接触且无需任何缝合材料,可实现移植物快速完全融合;(3)无固定材料意味着不存在金属植入物问题,便于翻修手术,并降低了总体成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验