Suppr超能文献

一项关于改良Ashworth量表作为肘部痉挛程度测量方法有效性的生物力学研究。

A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity.

作者信息

Pandyan Anand D, Price Christopher I M, Barnes Michael P, Johnson Garth R

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy Studies, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2003 May;17(3):290-3. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr610oa.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the criterion validity of the modified Ashworth Scale.

POPULATION

Volunteers from a stroke population admitted to a district general hospital stroke unit diagnosed with a first ever stroke less than 26 weeks previously.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Resistance to passive movement about the elbow was simultaneously quantified (biomechanically) and graded (modified Ashworth Scale). Passive range of movement and peak instantaneous velocity during passive movement were also measured.

ANALYSIS

Criterion validity was investigated as convergent construct validity (using the Spearman's correlation coefficient) and concurrent validity (using analysis of variance).

RESULTS

One hundred measurements were taken on 63 subjects. Correlation between the modified Ashworth Scale and resistance to passive movement was 0.511. Resistance to passive movement and velocity showed significant differences between the modified Ashworth score of '0' and a modified Ashworth score greater than '0' (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between MAS '1', '1+' and '2'. Resistance to passive movement in the impaired arm was significantly higher than in the nonimpaired arm (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The modified Ashworth Scale does not provide a valid measure of spasticity at lower grades but it may provide a measure of resistance to passive movement.

摘要

目的

探讨改良Ashworth量表的效标效度。

研究对象

来自某地区综合医院卒中单元的卒中志愿者,均被诊断为首次卒中且发病时间在26周以内。

观察指标

同时对肘关节被动活动的阻力进行定量(生物力学方法)和分级(改良Ashworth量表)。还测量了被动活动范围和被动活动时的峰值瞬时速度。

分析方法

通过收敛性结构效度(使用Spearman相关系数)和同时效度(使用方差分析)来研究效标效度。

结果

对63名受试者进行了100次测量。改良Ashworth量表与被动活动阻力之间的相关性为0.511。被动活动阻力和速度在改良Ashworth评分为“0”和大于“0”之间存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。MAS“1”、“1+”和“2”之间无显著差异。患侧手臂的被动活动阻力显著高于健侧手臂(p < 0.01)。

结论

改良Ashworth量表在较低分级时不能有效测量痉挛,但可能提供被动活动阻力的测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验