Scholes Julie, Endacott Ruth
Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, University of Brighton, Village Way, Falmer Brighton.
Nurs Crit Care. 2003 Mar-Apr;8(2):68-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1478-5153.2003.00008.x.
This paper reports the findings from a study commissioned by the English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (ENB), entitled Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Educational Preparation for Critical Care Nursing. One aim of the study was to generate evidence that incorporated the national perspective on the priorities for core competencies and a national threshold standard of the ENB critical care clinical awards. Although these courses are no longer validated by the professional statutory body, the findings illuminate some key insights into the current challenges facing providers and consumers of critical care education as well as into implications for all post-registration education provision. The paper outlines how the study data were collected, how the core competendes were generated and the national consultation exercise and the levers and barriers that affect the introduction of core competencies. Other aspects of the study data are reported elsewhere (Scholes and Endacott, 2002).
本文报告了一项由英国国家护理、助产与健康访视委员会(ENB)委托开展的研究结果,该研究名为《重症护理教育准备的有效性评估》。该研究的一个目的是生成证据,纳入国家对核心能力优先事项的看法以及ENB重症护理临床奖项的国家门槛标准。尽管这些课程不再由专业法定机构认证,但研究结果为重症护理教育的提供者和消费者当前面临的挑战以及对所有注册后教育提供的影响提供了一些关键见解。本文概述了研究数据的收集方式、核心能力的生成方式、全国咨询活动以及影响核心能力引入的推动因素和障碍。研究数据的其他方面在其他地方有报告(斯科尔斯和恩达科特,2002年)。