• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

B女士与法律行为能力:审视护士在艰难的伦理法律决策中的作用

Ms B and legal competence: examining the role of nurses in difficult ethico-legal decision-making.

作者信息

Goodman Benny

机构信息

University of Plymouth, Institute of Health Studies, Cornwall.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2003 Mar-Apr;8(2):78-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1478-5153.2003.00012.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1478-5153.2003.00012.x
PMID:12737192
Abstract

The case of Ms B throws up some interesting issues regarding the role of the nurse in assisting patients in making and implementing their decisions. The High Court transcript makes it clear who the voices with influence in legal matters were, and why the decisions they took were made. Absent from the myriad voices is that of the profession of nursing. Are nurses silenced by professional boundaries, the legal framework or lack of confidence? The concept of nursing advocacy is once again thrown into relief and critical questions need asking about the limits of professional nursing practice.

摘要

B女士的案例引发了一些关于护士在协助患者做出并执行决策中所扮演角色的有趣问题。高等法院的庭审记录明确了在法律事务中具有影响力的声音是谁,以及他们做出这些决定的原因。在众多声音中,护理行业的声音却缺席了。是专业界限、法律框架还是缺乏信心让护士们保持沉默?护理倡导的概念再次凸显出来,对于专业护理实践的局限性需要提出一些关键问题。

相似文献

1
Ms B and legal competence: examining the role of nurses in difficult ethico-legal decision-making.B女士与法律行为能力:审视护士在艰难的伦理法律决策中的作用
Nurs Crit Care. 2003 Mar-Apr;8(2):78-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1478-5153.2003.00012.x.
2
Ms. B and legal competence: interprofessional collaboration and nurse autonomy.B女士与法律行为能力:跨专业协作与护士自主性
Nurs Crit Care. 2004 Nov-Dec;9(6):271-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1362-1017.2004.00086.x.
3
The living will--are you for or against?生前预嘱——你支持还是反对?
J Fam Health Care. 2003;13(1):9.
4
Quandary at the crossroads: paternalism versus advocacy surrounding end-of-treatment decisions.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1995 Jul-Aug;12(4):43-6. doi: 10.1177/104990919501200414.
5
The significance for critical care nurses of the "dying with dignity" legislation.“尊严死”立法对重症护理护士的意义。
Aust Crit Care. 1994 Jun;7(2):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(94)70200-9.
6
Critical incident: reflection on the process of terminal weaning.关键事件:对终末期撤机过程的反思
Br J Nurs. 2000;9(16):1059-62. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2000.9.16.5477.
7
The Schiavo legacy.
Nurs Econ. 2005 May-Jun;23(3):136-7.
8
Thunder from California: the Thor decision and the ever-expanding right to die.来自加利福尼亚的惊雷:索尔案判决与不断扩大的死亡权利
Healthspan. 1993 Oct;10(9):13-7.
9
A proposed bill on assisted dying in the UK.英国一项关于协助死亡的提案法案。
Nurs Ethics. 2006 Mar;13(2):103-4. doi: 10.1191/0969733006ne831ed.
10
Legal mechanisms to protect dialysis patients' end-of-life decisions.保护透析患者临终决策的法律机制。
Nephrol News Issues. 2005 Jun;19(7):53-4.