Oh Won-Suck, Park Ju-Mi, Anusavice Kenneth
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0435, USA.
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):135-40.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the fracture toughness (K(IC)) of an experimental hot-pressed core ceramic measured by fractographic analysis of failed ceramic prostheses and the values determined by other standard methods.
Four groups were subjected to one of four test methods: group 1 = indentation strength technique (standard numerical calculation); group 2 = indentation strength technique (fractographic analysis); group 3 = flexure test of precracked specimens (fractographic analysis); and group 4 = fractographic analysis of failed three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPD). For groups 1 to 3, 20 ceramic bar specimens were subjected to three-point flexure at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred. For group 4, 10 failed FPDs were collected from a previous study. Stress values at failure were calculated from either a flexure stress equation (groups 1 to 3) or from finite element analyses (group 4). K(IC) values were calculated from an equation and fractographic measurement data.
Mean fracture toughness ranged from 3.1 MPa x m1/2 (SD 0.2) (group 1) to 3.4 MPa x m1/2 (SD 0.2) (group 4). The mean K(IC) value for group 1 was significantly different from that of group 4; however, no significant differences were found between groups 1, 2, and 3, or between groups 2, 3, and 4.
Fracture toughness for an experimental hot-pressed core ceramic measured by fractographic analysis in combination with finite element analysis was comparable with the values determined with other standard fractographic methods.
本研究的目的是检验以下假设:通过对失效陶瓷假体进行断口分析测得的实验性热压核陶瓷的断裂韧性(K(IC))与通过其他标准方法测定的值之间无显著差异。
四组分别采用四种测试方法之一:第1组 = 压痕强度技术(标准数值计算);第2组 = 压痕强度技术(断口分析);第3组 = 预裂纹试样的弯曲试验(断口分析);第4组 = 对失效的三单位固定局部义齿(FPD)进行断口分析。对于第1至3组,20个陶瓷棒试样以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度进行三点弯曲直至发生断裂。对于第4组,从先前的研究中收集了10个失效的FPD。失效时的应力值通过弯曲应力方程(第1至3组)或有限元分析(第4组)计算得出。K(IC)值根据一个方程和断口测量数据计算得出。
平均断裂韧性范围从3.1 MPa×m1/2(标准差0.2)(第1组)到3.4 MPa×m1/2(标准差0.2)(第4组)。第1组的平均K(IC)值与第4组的显著不同;然而,在第1、2和3组之间,或在第2、3和4组之间未发现显著差异。
通过断口分析结合有限元分析测得的实验性热压核陶瓷的断裂韧性与用其他标准断口方法测定的值相当。