Martín Sonsoles, Lyupina Yulia, Crespo José Antonio, González Begoña, García-Lecumberri Carmen, Ambrosio Emilio
Departamento de Psicobiología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Brain Res. 2003 May 30;973(2):205-13. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02482-x.
Previously, we have shown that Lewis (LEW) rats acquire faster than Fischer 344 (F344) rats operant food- and morphine-reinforced tasks under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. The first purpose of the present work has been to study if differences in operant responding behavior may participate in the reported differences in morphine self-administration behavior between both inbred rat strains. To this end, we have analyzed the microstructure of responding obtained under a variable-interval (VI) of food reinforcement by calculating the inter-response time (IRT) for each rat strain. LEW rats exhibited shorter IRTs than F344 rats, suggesting that LEW rats may have an inherent high or compulsive operant responding activity. When subjects of both inbred rat strains were submitted to a schedule of morphine reinforcement of high responding requirements such as progressive ratio schedules, LEW rats also reached significantly higher breaking points and final response ratio than F344 rats for i.v. morphine self-administration. Given that there are neurochemical differences between both rat strains and that glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and dopaminergic D(1) receptors have been involved in operant responding behavior, a second purpose of this work has been to measure basal NMDA and D(1) receptor levels in these rat strains by quantitative receptor autoradiography. Compared to F344 rats, LEW rats showed higher basal NMDA receptor levels in frontal and cingulate cortex, caudate putamen, central amygdaloid nuclei, and intermediate white layer of superior colliculus, and higher basal D(1) receptor levels in several areas of hippocampus and thalamus, and substantia nigra pars reticulata. Taken together, these results suggest that an inherent high operant responding activity of LEW rats may have a role in the previous reported faster acquisition of opiate-reinforced behavior in operant self-administration paradigms under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. In addition, a basal higher NMDA and D(1) receptor levels of LEW rats compared to F344 rats may participate in the neurochemical background that mediates the behavioral differences between both inbred rat strains.
此前,我们已经表明,在固定比率强化程序下,Lewis(LEW)大鼠比Fischer 344(F344)大鼠更快地习得操作性食物和吗啡强化任务。本研究的首要目的是探究操作性反应行为的差异是否可能与这两种近交系大鼠在吗啡自我给药行为上已报道的差异有关。为此,我们通过计算每种大鼠品系的反应间隔时间(IRT),分析了在可变间隔(VI)食物强化条件下获得的反应微观结构。LEW大鼠的IRT比F344大鼠短,这表明LEW大鼠可能具有内在的高或强迫性操作性反应活动。当这两种近交系大鼠的实验对象接受高反应要求的吗啡强化程序,如累进比率程序时,在静脉注射吗啡自我给药方面,LEW大鼠的断点和最终反应比率也显著高于F344大鼠。鉴于这两种大鼠品系之间存在神经化学差异,且谷氨酸能N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)和多巴胺能D(1)受体参与了操作性反应行为,本研究的第二个目的是通过定量受体放射自显影法测量这些大鼠品系中基础NMDA和D(1)受体水平。与F344大鼠相比,LEW大鼠在额叶和扣带回皮质、尾状壳核、中央杏仁核以及上丘中间白质层的基础NMDA受体水平更高,在海马体、丘脑的几个区域以及黑质网状部的基础D(1)受体水平更高。综上所述,这些结果表明,LEW大鼠固有的高操作性反应活动可能在先前报道的在固定比率强化程序下的操作性自我给药范式中更快习得阿片类强化行为中起作用。此外,与F344大鼠相比,LEW大鼠基础更高的NMDA和D(1)受体水平可能参与了介导这两种近交系大鼠行为差异的神经化学背景。