Perry Conrad
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Apr;56(3):515-30. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000512.
This paper reports three spelling experiments that examined the effect of lexical priming through intervening items. In the first and second experiments, a strong effect of word priming on nonword spelling was found, even when two intervening filler items separated primetarget pairs. In addition, the absolute size of the effect was similar when one intervening item separated primetarget pairs and when two intervening items separated primetarget pairs. A much larger effect was found when no intervening items were used, however. This effect did not appear to be related to filler type, as Experiment 1 used nonword fillers, and Experiment 2 used word fillers. The third experiment examined the same effect with two intervening filler items, but instead used nonwords as primes (and thus examined a subsyllabic repetition effect). A similar-sized effect as that of the first and second experiments was found. The most plausible explanation of these results, which is consistent with the interactive dual-route model of spelling, is that they reflect the priming of soundspelling rules that people use to spell nonwords.
本文报告了三项拼写实验，这些实验通过插入项目来检验词汇启动的效果。在第一个和第二个实验中，发现单词启动对非单词拼写有很强的影响，即使两个插入的填充项目将启动词-目标词对隔开。此外，当一个插入项目将启动词-目标词对隔开时和当两个插入项目将启动词-目标词对隔开时，效果的绝对大小相似。然而，当不使用插入项目时，发现的效果要大得多。这种效果似乎与填充类型无关，因为实验1使用非单词填充，实验2使用单词填充。第三个实验用两个插入填充项目检验了相同的效果，但改用非单词作为启动词（从而检验了亚音节重复效果）。发现了与第一个和第二个实验大小相似的效果。这些结果最合理的解释，与拼写的交互式双路径模型一致，是它们反映了人们用于拼写非单词的语音-拼写规则的启动。
