Suppr超能文献

平权行动。心理数据与政策辩论。

Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates.

作者信息

Crosby Faye J, Iyer Aarti, Clayton Susan, Downing Roberta A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Social Sciences II, Room 277, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2003 Feb;58(2):93-115. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.2.93.

Abstract

The authors bring psychological research to bear on an examination of the policy of affirmative action. They argue that data from many studies reveal that affirmative action as a policy has more benefits than costs. Although the majority of pro-affirmative action arguments in the social sciences stress diversity, the authors' argument focuses on issues of merit. The merit-based argument, grounded in empirical studies, concludes that the policy of affirmative action conforms to the American ideal of fairness and is a necessary policy.

摘要

作者运用心理学研究来审视平权行动政策。他们认为,众多研究的数据表明,平权行动政策的益处多于成本。尽管社会科学中多数支持平权行动的论点都强调多样性,但作者的论点聚焦于功绩问题。基于实证研究的功绩论观点得出结论,平权行动政策符合美国的公平理想,是一项必要政策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验