Crosby Faye J, Iyer Aarti, Clayton Susan, Downing Roberta A
Department of Psychology, Social Sciences II, Room 277, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Am Psychol. 2003 Feb;58(2):93-115. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.2.93.
The authors bring psychological research to bear on an examination of the policy of affirmative action. They argue that data from many studies reveal that affirmative action as a policy has more benefits than costs. Although the majority of pro-affirmative action arguments in the social sciences stress diversity, the authors' argument focuses on issues of merit. The merit-based argument, grounded in empirical studies, concludes that the policy of affirmative action conforms to the American ideal of fairness and is a necessary policy.
作者运用心理学研究来审视平权行动政策。他们认为,众多研究的数据表明,平权行动政策的益处多于成本。尽管社会科学中多数支持平权行动的论点都强调多样性,但作者的论点聚焦于功绩问题。基于实证研究的功绩论观点得出结论,平权行动政策符合美国的公平理想,是一项必要政策。