DeVille K
Department of Medical Humanities, School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1256-61. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1256.
Affirmative action programs of all types are under attack legally and politically. Although medical schools have not been specifically targeted, their affirmative action programs, like others in higher education, are potentially in danger. This article examines the current legal status of affirmative action in medical education and concludes that a refurbished defense of such programs is essential if they are to survive impending judicial and political scrutiny. An analysis of existing case law and available evidence suggests that a carefully reinvigorated diversity argument is the tactic most likely to pass constitutional muster, as well as the justification most likely to blunt growing public and political opposition to admissions policies that take race and ethnicity into consideration.
各类平权行动项目在法律和政治层面都受到了攻击。尽管医学院校并未成为特定的攻击目标,但它们的平权行动项目,与高等教育中的其他项目一样,也面临着潜在的危险。本文审视了医学教育中平权行动的当前法律状况,并得出结论:如果这些项目要在即将到来的司法和政治审查中存续下来,对其进行重新构建的辩护至关重要。对现有判例法和可得证据的分析表明,精心重振的多元化论点是最有可能通过宪法审查的策略,也是最有可能缓和公众及政治界对考虑种族和族裔因素的招生政策日益增长的反对的理由。