Varadarajan Padmini, Pai Ramdas G
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California 92354, USA.
J Card Fail. 2003 Apr;9(2):107-12. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.13.
BACKGROUND: Patients with congestive heart failure have an annual mortality of 10% to 20% depending on disease severity. Though one third of these patients have normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), their natural history is poorly defined. Small population-based studies have suggested a more benign prognosis for patients with preserved LVEF. However, prognosis in hospitalized patients, who form a higher risk group, is not known. METHODS: We investigated the survival patterns of 2,258 patients with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of congestive heart failure between 1990 and 1999. Survival was analyzed and patients with normal and reduced LVEF were compared. RESULTS: Their age was 71 +/- 11 years, and 97% were men. There were 1,535 deaths over a mean follow up of 786 days. Of these, 963 (43%) patients had a normal LVEF (>/=55%). Patients with normal LVEF were of the same age as those with reduced LVEF, but had a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (20 versus 26%, P =.03), left bundle branch block (2 versus 12%, P <.0001), significant mitral regurgitation (5 versus 31%, P <.0001) and electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial infarction (38 versus 60%, P <.0001). Despite lesser comorbidities, they had a higher mortality hazard, with a 5-year survival of 22% compared with 28% for those with systolic heart failure (P =.007). Proportional hazards model showed presence of normal EF as a categoric variable to be an independent predictor of mortality in those with heart failure after correcting for age and rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure and normal LVEF is worse than those with reduced EF despite lesser comorbidities. Studies addressing optimal management of these patients are warranted.
背景:充血性心力衰竭患者的年死亡率因疾病严重程度而异,为10%至20%。尽管这些患者中有三分之一的左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)正常,但其自然病史尚不明确。基于小样本人群的研究表明,左心室射血分数保留的患者预后较好。然而,对于构成更高风险组的住院患者的预后情况尚不清楚。 方法:我们调查了1990年至1999年间2258例出院诊断为充血性心力衰竭的患者的生存模式。分析了生存率,并比较了左心室射血分数正常和降低的患者。 结果:他们的年龄为71±11岁,97%为男性。平均随访786天期间有1535例死亡。其中,963例(43%)患者左心室射血分数正常(≥55%)。左心室射血分数正常的患者与射血分数降低的患者年龄相同,但心房颤动患病率较低(20%对26%,P = 0.03),左束支传导阻滞患病率较低(2%对12%,P < 0.0001),严重二尖瓣反流患病率较低(5%对31%,P < 0.0001),心肌梗死心电图证据较少(38%对60%,P < 0.0001)。尽管合并症较少,但他们的死亡风险更高,5年生存率为22%,而收缩性心力衰竭患者为28%(P = 0.007)。比例风险模型显示,在校正年龄和心律后,左心室射血分数正常作为分类变量是心力衰竭患者死亡的独立预测因素。 结论:尽管合并症较少,但充血性心力衰竭且左心室射血分数正常的住院患者的预后比射血分数降低的患者更差。有必要开展针对这些患者最佳管理的研究。
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2006-4
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025-1-24
J Clin Med. 2024-5-22
Int J Angiol. 2022-9-23
ESC Heart Fail. 2020-10
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020-1