[Comparative study on characteristics of congestive heart failure patients with preserved versus abnormal left ventricular systolic function and evaluation effects of therapy].

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical characteristics and effects of therapy for hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and different left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during hospitalization.

METHODS

The medical records of 1 074 unselected consecutive patients with CHF who were admitted to Queen Mary Hospital from January, 2001 to January, 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Three hundred and ninety-nine patients were categorized as having either normal left ventricular systolic function or systolic dysfunction based on the results of echocardiography. Clinical features with a slightly modified version of the Framingham criteria, laboratory results and drug therapies at discharge were compared.

RESULTS

Among patients, the majority were women, 95.5% were > or =65 years and 50.6% > or =80 years of age. Classification of the severity of heart failure showed that 70.2% were New York Heart Association (NYHA) III and IV. Only 399 patients had borderline LVEF at the time of hospitalization, of these patients 191 (47.9%) had preserved systolic function (LVEF > or =0.50), and 208 (52.1%) with LVEF<0.50. Patients with LVEF > or =0.50, who tended to be elderly and more often female, exhibited a lower incidence of coronary artery disease and diabetes than patients with LVEF<0.50 (all P<0.05). Patients with preserved systolic function had a significantly higher prevalence of auricular fibrillation (P<0.05), accounting for up to 84 patients (44.0%) with it, and number of hospitalization for CHF increased. Among patients with systolic dysfunction, 22.6% were discharged on a therapeutic regimen of digoxin, 63.0% on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), and 12.0% on a beta-blocker, 13.9% on a calcium channel blocker. These accounted for 62.3%, 35.1%, 9.4% and 18.3% in patients with preserved systolic function, respectively. There was a higher incidence of use of digoxin (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized patients with heart failure, the clinical signs and symptoms of chronic heart failure are similar to those of patients with CHF, LVEF is a powerful prognostic predictor to distinguish CHF patients with normal systolic function from those with systolic dysfunction. Criteria for use of ACEI and beta-blocker are still not clear cut. It is important to differentiate CHF patients with LVEF<0.50 from that with LVEF> or =0.50 in order to achieve a better therapeutic result in the treatment of CHF.