Natale Valéria Maria, Brenner Ingrid Karen, Moldoveanu Andrei Ion, Vasiliou Paris, Shek Pang, Shephard Roy Jesse
Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2003 Jan 2;121(1):9-14. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802003000100003. Epub 2003 Jul 4.
High-intensity exercise causes tissue damage, production of stress hormones, and alterations in the function and quantity of various immune cells. Many clinical-physical stressors such as surgery, trauma, burns and sepsis induce a pattern of hormonal and immunological response similar to that of exercise. It has thus been suggested that heavy exercise might be used to cause graded and well-defined amounts of muscle trauma, thereby serving as an experimental model for inflammation and sepsis.
In order to explore whether some form of strenuous exercise might provide an useful model for the inflammatory process, we studied the effects of three different exercise protocols on blood leukocyte count during and following exercise.
Four different experimental conditions, using a randomized-block design.
Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Eight healthy and moderately fit males.
Participants were each assigned to four experimental conditions. Subjects performed 5 minutes of cycle-ergometry exercise at 90%, 2 hours of cycle-ergometry exercise at 60%, a standard circuit of resistance exercises with 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 60 to 70% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM) force at each of 5 different stations; or they remained seated for 5 hours. DIAGNOSTIC TEST USED: Flow cytometric analysis.
Blood samples were analyzed for total leukocyte counts, total T cells, T helper/inducer cells, T suppressor/cytotoxic cells, B cells, cytolytic T cells, and natural killer cells.
The peak aerobic and prolonged submaximal exercise induced similar alterations in cell counts. These changes were generally larger than those produced by the resistance exercise, although both resistance and peak aerobic exercise resulted in a significantly longer-lasting decrease in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio than the submaximal exercise bout did.
The data suggest that, of the three exercise patterns tested, prolonged aerobic exercise induced the largest and most readily measured patterns of immune response. Nevertheless, the changes provided only a partial model for the clinical inflammatory process.
高强度运动可导致组织损伤、应激激素产生以及各种免疫细胞功能和数量的改变。许多临床物理应激源,如手术、创伤、烧伤和脓毒症,会引发与运动类似的激素和免疫反应模式。因此,有人提出剧烈运动可用于造成分级且明确的肌肉创伤量,从而作为炎症和脓毒症的实验模型。
为了探究某种形式的剧烈运动是否可为炎症过程提供有用模型,我们研究了三种不同运动方案对运动期间及运动后血液白细胞计数的影响。
采用随机区组设计的四种不同实验条件。
加拿大安大略省北约克国防与民用环境医学研究所。
八名健康且适度健康的男性。
每位参与者被分配到四种实验条件。受试者分别进行了以下运动:以90%强度进行5分钟的蹬车测力计运动;以60%强度进行2小时的蹬车测力计运动;在5个不同站点进行标准的阻力训练循环,每组10次重复,强度为一次重复最大值(1-RM)的60%至70%;或者他们静坐5小时。使用的诊断测试:流式细胞术分析。
分析血样中的总白细胞计数、总T细胞、辅助性T/诱导性T细胞、抑制性T/细胞毒性T细胞、B细胞、细胞毒性T细胞和自然杀伤细胞。
峰值有氧运动和长时间次最大强度运动诱导的细胞计数变化相似。这些变化通常比阻力运动产生的变化更大,尽管阻力运动和峰值有氧运动导致CD4+/CD8+比值下降的持续时间均明显长于次最大强度运动。
数据表明,在所测试的三种运动模式中,长时间有氧运动诱导的免疫反应模式最大且最易于测量。然而,这些变化仅为临床炎症过程提供了部分模型。