Phillips Michael, Cataneo Renee N, Ditkoff Beth Ann, Fisher Peter, Greenberg Joel, Gunawardena Ratnasiri, Kwon C Stephan, Rahbari-Oskoui Farid, Wong Cynthia
Menssana Research Inc., Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024, USA.
Breast J. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):184-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09309.x.
Breast cancer is accompanied by increased oxidative stress and induction of polymorphic cytochrome P-450 mixed oxidase enzymes (CYP). Both processes affect the abundance of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath because oxidative stress causes lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in membranes, producing alkanes and methylalkanes which are catabolized by CYP. We performed a pilot study of breath VOCs, a potential new marker of disease in women with breast cancer. This was a combined case-control and cross-sectional study of women with abnormal mammograms scheduled for a breast biopsy. Breath samples were analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy in order to determine the breath methylated alkane contour (BMAC), a three-dimensional display of the alveolar gradients (abundance in breath minus abundance in room air) of C4-C20 alkanes and monomethylated alkanes. BMACs in women with and without breast cancer were compared using forward stepwise discriminant analysis. Two hundred one breath samples were obtained from women with abnormal mammograms and biopsies read by two pathologists. There were 51 cases of breast cancer in 198 concordant biopsies. The breath test distinguished between women with breast cancer and healthy volunteers with a sensitivity of 94.1% (48/51) and a specificity of 73.8% (31/42) (cross-validated sensitivity 88.2% (45/51), specificity 73.8% (31/42)). Compared to women with abnormal mammograms and no cancer on biopsy, the breath test identified breast cancer with a sensitivity of 62.7% (32/51) and a specificity of 84.0% (42/50) (cross-validated sensitivity of 60.8% (31/51), specificity of 82.0% (41/50)). The negative predictive value (NPV) of a screening breath test for breast cancer was superior to a screening mammogram (99.93% versus 99.89%); the positive predictive value (PPV) of a screening mammogram was superior to a screening breath test (4.63% versus 1.29%). A breath test for markers of oxidative stress accurately identified women with breast cancer, with an NPV superior to a screening mammogram. This breath test could potentially be employed as a primary screen for breast cancer. Confirmatory studies in larger groups are required.
乳腺癌伴随着氧化应激增加以及多态性细胞色素P-450混合氧化酶(CYP)的诱导。这两个过程都会影响呼出气体中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的含量,因为氧化应激会导致膜中多不饱和脂肪酸发生脂质过氧化,产生烷烃和甲基烷烃,而这些物质会被CYP分解代谢。我们对呼出气体中的VOCs进行了一项初步研究,VOCs是乳腺癌女性患者一种潜在的新疾病标志物。这是一项针对计划进行乳房活检且乳房X光检查异常的女性的病例对照与横断面联合研究。通过气相色谱和质谱分析呼气样本,以确定呼气甲基化烷烃轮廓(BMAC),它是C4 - C20烷烃和单甲基化烷烃肺泡梯度(呼出气体中的含量减去室内空气中的含量)的三维显示。使用向前逐步判别分析比较患有和未患有乳腺癌女性的BMAC。从乳房X光检查异常且活检结果由两位病理学家解读的女性中获取了201份呼气样本。在198份一致的活检结果中,有51例乳腺癌病例。呼气测试在区分乳腺癌女性和健康志愿者方面,敏感性为94.1%(48/51),特异性为73.8%(31/42)(交叉验证敏感性88.2%(45/51),特异性73.8%(31/42))。与乳房X光检查异常且活检未发现癌症的女性相比,呼气测试识别乳腺癌的敏感性为62.7%(32/51),特异性为84.0%(42/50)(交叉验证敏感性为60.8%(31/51),特异性为82.0%(41/50))。乳腺癌筛查呼气测试的阴性预测值(NPV)优于乳房X光筛查(99.93%对99.89%);乳房X光筛查的阳性预测值(PPV)优于呼气测试(4.63%对1.29%)。一项针对氧化应激标志物的呼气测试能够准确识别乳腺癌女性,其NPV优于乳房X光筛查。这种呼气测试有可能被用作乳腺癌的初步筛查方法。需要在更大规模的群体中进行验证性研究。