Suppr超能文献

一项针对面临复杂健康决策的加拿大人决策需求的调查。

A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions.

作者信息

O'Connor Annette M, Drake Elizabeth R, Wells George A, Tugwell Peter, Laupacis Andreas, Elmslie Tom

机构信息

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2003 Jun;6(2):97-109. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00215.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the decision-making needs of Canadians when faced with 'complex' health decisions characterized by balancing advantages against disadvantages. Although a national report emphasized that public confidence in the health-care system depends on support for personal knowledge and decision-making, there has been no systematic investigation of the Canadian population's decision-making needs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional telephone survey using random digit dialling.

PARTICIPANTS

National sample of 635 adults over 18 years of age, living in Canada.

RESULTS

Forty-two percentage of eligible contacts participated. Sixty-five percent of contacts reported making 'complex' health decisions, commonly about medical or surgical treatments or birth control, and more commonly by women and by married/separated individuals. Most respondents took an active role in their decisions, often sharing the process with their partner or family. Being younger was associated with a more independent role. Physicians were more often involved in the decisions of respondents with less education. Fifty-nine percent of respondents experienced decisional conflict; more conflict was seen with those who were female and feeling uninformed about options, pressured to select one particular option, and unready or unskilled in decision-making. Less decisional conflict was seen in those who reported birth control decisions and in those who were 70 years and older. Participants used several strategies when deliberating about choices including: information gathering, clarifying their values, and seeking support and information from others. Personal counselling and printed information materials were commonly preferred methods of learning about options. 'Essential' criteria for judging satisfactory decision-making included: having sufficient knowledge about the options, outcomes, and probabilities; being clear about values; selecting and implementing a choice that agrees with personal values; and expressing satisfaction with the choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Canadians, particularly women, face difficult decisions and need support and information from credible sources.

摘要

目的

描述加拿大人在面对以权衡利弊为特征的“复杂”健康决策时的决策需求。尽管一份国家报告强调公众对医疗保健系统的信心取决于对个人知识和决策的支持,但尚未对加拿大民众的决策需求进行系统调查。

设计

采用随机数字拨号的横断面电话调查。

参与者

居住在加拿大的635名18岁以上成年人的全国样本。

结果

42%符合条件的联系人参与了调查。65%的联系人报告做出了“复杂”的健康决策,常见的是关于医疗或手术治疗或节育,女性以及已婚/分居者做出此类决策更为常见。大多数受访者在决策中发挥了积极作用,通常会与伴侣或家人分享决策过程。年龄较小与更独立的角色相关。教育程度较低的受访者的决策中医生参与得更频繁。59%的受访者经历了决策冲突;女性、对选择情况不了解、在选择某一特定选项时感到有压力以及在决策方面没有准备好或不熟练的人,决策冲突更多。报告节育决策的人和70岁及以上的人决策冲突较少。参与者在考虑选择时使用了多种策略,包括:收集信息、明确自己的价值观以及向他人寻求支持和信息。个人咨询和印刷信息材料通常是了解选择的首选方法。判断满意决策的“基本”标准包括:对选项、结果和概率有足够的了解;明确价值观;选择并实施符合个人价值观的选择;以及对选择表示满意。

结论

加拿大人,尤其是女性,面临艰难的决策,需要来自可靠来源的支持和信息。

相似文献

1
A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions.
Health Expect. 2003 Jun;6(2):97-109. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00215.x.
3
Health preferences and decision-making needs of disadvantaged women.
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Nov;56(3):247-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04029.x.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.
6
Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Sep 16;7(2):23814683221124090. doi: 10.1177/23814683221124090. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
8
Parental decision making involvement and decisional conflict: a descriptive study.
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jun 13;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0899-4.
9
Predictors of Decision Regret among Caregivers of Older Canadians Receiving Home Care: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Aug 11;7(2):23814683221116304. doi: 10.1177/23814683221116304. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
10
A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

2
How Women and Men with Parkinson's Disease Approach Decision-Making for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;12(4):453-463. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14284. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Nov 5;25(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02633-9.
6
Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for pediatric interval appendectomy.
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Nov 8;5(4):e000466. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000466. eCollection 2022.
7
Needs assessment of parents for a patient decision aid in pediatric interval appendectomy via the qualitative interview method.
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Feb 7;5(2):e000371. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000371. eCollection 2022.
9
Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Sep 16;7(2):23814683221124090. doi: 10.1177/23814683221124090. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
10
Experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis with rehabilitation-a qualitative interview study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08150-8.

本文引用的文献

2
Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):67-80. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024212.
3
Feasibility and effects of decision aids.
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114.
4
What is a good decision?
Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):185-97.
5
The Ottawa patient decision aids.
Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):163-70.
6
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731.
9
A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Mar;33(3):267-79. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00026-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验