Suppr超能文献

根据丙型肝炎干扰素应答-复发患者的病毒血症情况,比较干扰素联合利巴韦林与单用干扰素进行再治疗:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照研究。

Retreatment with interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone according to viraemia in interferon responder-relapser hepatitis C patients: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Portal I, Bourlière M, Halfon P, De Lédinghen V, Couzigou P, Bernard P H, Blanc F, Caroli-Bosc F, Arpurt J P, Vetter D, Mathieu-Chandelier C, Chazouillères O, Thiefin G, Pol S, Sogni P, Abergel A, Bailly F, Picon M, Debonne J M, Zamora C, Alleman I, Moreau X, Doll F, Eugène C, Ducloux S, Larrey D, Ouzan D, Grimaud J C, Gouvernet J, Botti G, Gérolami V, Khiri H, Gérolami A, Gauthier A P, Botta-Fridlund D

机构信息

Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Hospital La Conception, 13008 Marseille, France.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2003 May;10(3):215-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00426.x.

Abstract

Low pretreatment viral load has consistently been shown to be an independent predictor of sustained response (SR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin vs IFN alone in low viraemic patients (<2 millions copies/mL) who had relapsed to a previous course of IFN and the efficacy of 24 vs 48 week combination therapy in high viraemic patients. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomly assigned to one of the four regimens after stratification on pretreatment viral load. All patients received IFN-alpha2b (6 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks and 3 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks). Patients with low viraemia received either IFN-alpha2b alone for 48 weeks (R1: 42 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin (600 mg/day) for 24 weeks and IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R2: 48 patients). Patients with high viral load received either IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and then IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R3: 104 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks (R4: 103 patients). In low viraemic patients the rate of SR was 37.7% in group R1 and 59.6% in group R2 (P < 0.05). In high viraemic patients, the rate of SR was 44.7% in group R3 and 51.4% in group R4 (P: NS). Thirty-one patients discontinued treatment (10.4%) without difference regarding treatment regimen. In the regimen using ribavirin we found no difference in terms of SR between patients receiving a dose of ribavirin below 10.6 mg/kg/day (55%) or over 10.6 mg/kg/day (58%). Histological improvement occurred in 70.2% of patients regardless of the regimen. Logistic regression showed that genotype 2 and 3, Knodell score <6 and alanine aminotransferase pretreatment level >3 x upper limit of normal were significantly and independently correlated with SR. In low viraemic patients who relapsed to a previous IFN treatment, combination therapy using high-dose IFN and low-dose ribavirin is better than high-dose IFN alone. In high viraemic patients there was no benefit in increasing the duration of combination therapy from 24 to 48 weeks. In this study, it was found that low dose of ribavirin can be used safely and there is no effect of ribavirin dose on SR.

摘要

慢性丙型肝炎感染患者治疗前病毒载量低一直被证明是持续应答(SR)的独立预测指标。我们评估了干扰素(IFN)联合利巴韦林与单用IFN对既往IFN治疗复发的低病毒血症患者(<200万拷贝/毫升)的疗效,以及24周与48周联合治疗对高病毒血症患者的疗效。根据治疗前病毒载量分层后,297例患者被随机分配至四种治疗方案之一。所有患者均接受α-2b干扰素治疗(第1个24周每周3次,每次600万单位;第2个24周每周3次,每次300万单位)。低病毒血症患者接受48周单用α-2b干扰素治疗(R1组:42例患者)或α-2b干扰素联合利巴韦林(600毫克/天)治疗24周,随后24周单用α-2b干扰素治疗(R2组:48例患者)。高病毒载量患者接受α-2b干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗24周,随后24周单用α-2b干扰素治疗(R3组:104例患者)或α-2b干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗48周(R4组:103例患者)。在低病毒血症患者中,R1组的SR率为37.7%,R2组为59.6%(P<0.05)。在高病毒血症患者中,R3组的SR率为44.7%,R4组为51.4%(P:无显著性差异)。31例患者中断治疗(10.4%),不同治疗方案间无差异。在使用利巴韦林的治疗方案中,我们发现接受低于10.6毫克/千克/天剂量利巴韦林的患者(55%)与接受高于10.6毫克/千克/天剂量利巴韦林的患者(58%)在SR方面无差异。无论采用何种治疗方案,70.2%的患者出现组织学改善。逻辑回归分析显示,2型和3型基因型、Knodell评分<6以及治疗前丙氨酸转氨酶水平>正常上限3倍与SR显著且独立相关。对于既往IFN治疗复发的低病毒血症患者,高剂量IFN联合低剂量利巴韦林的联合治疗优于单用高剂量IFN。对于高病毒血症患者,将联合治疗时间从24周延长至48周并无益处。在本研究中,发现低剂量利巴韦林可安全使用,且利巴韦林剂量对SR无影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验