Pilnick Alison, Coleman Tim
School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, University Park, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(1):135-45. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00336-2.
This paper focuses on general practice consultations where the issue of patients' smoking is raised and problematised by general practitioners (GPs) by linking it to their presenting or ongoing medical conditions. The data are taken from a larger study in one country of the UK, of the factors influencing discussion of smoking between GPs and patients who smoke. Consultations have been examined informed by the conversation analysis literature, with a focus on patients' resistance to doctors' problematisation of smoking. It is argued that, despite evidence from other areas of health care that advice is most effective when it is personalised, and despite GPs' expressed views that a preferred way of topicalising smoking is to make links to a patient's current medical problems, this is not generally the case in these consultations. Linking smoking to current problems commonly results in explicit resistance from patients of a kind that is rarely seen in other medical consultations. It is postulated that this results from the moral implications of linking a person's health status with their own behaviour, thereby undermining their claim to legitimate illness and to medical help.
本文聚焦于全科医疗咨询,即在这些咨询中,全科医生(GP)将患者吸烟问题与其当前就诊的或持续存在的医疗状况联系起来,从而提出该问题并将其视为有问题的情况。数据取自英国一个国家的一项更大规模的研究,该研究关注影响全科医生与吸烟患者之间关于吸烟问题讨论的因素。本研究参考会话分析文献对咨询进行了考察,重点关注患者对医生将吸烟视为问题的抵制情况。有人认为,尽管来自其他医疗保健领域的证据表明,个性化建议最为有效,而且尽管全科医生表示,将吸烟问题与患者当前的医疗问题联系起来是提出吸烟问题的一种理想方式,但在这些咨询中通常并非如此。将吸烟与当前问题联系起来通常会导致患者的明确抵制,这种抵制在其他医疗咨询中很少见。据推测,这是因为将一个人的健康状况与其自身行为联系起来会产生道德影响,从而损害了他们声称自己患有合理疾病并需要医疗帮助的权利。