Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Aug 3;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0992-x.
Clinical guidelines exhort clinicians to encourage patients to improve their health behaviours. However, most offer little support on how to have these conversations in practice. Clinicians fear that health behaviour change talk will create interactional difficulties and discomfort for both clinician and patient. This review aims to identify how healthcare professionals can best communicate with patients about health behaviour change (HBC).
We included studies which used conversation analysis or discourse analysis to study recorded interactions between healthcare professionals and patients. We followed an aggregative thematic synthesis approach. This involved line-by-line coding of the results and discussion sections of included studies, and the inductive development and hierarchical grouping of descriptive themes. Top-level themes were organised to reflect their conversational positioning.
Of the 17,562 studies identified through systematic searching, ten papers were included. Analysis resulted in 10 top-level descriptive themes grouped into three domains: initiating; carrying out; and closing health behaviour change talk. Of three methods of initiation, two facilitated further discussion, and one was associated with outright resistance. Of two methods of conducting behaviour change talk, one was associated with only minimal patient responses. One way of closing was identified, and patients did not seem to respond to this positively. Results demonstrated a series of specific conversational practices which clinicians use when talking about HBC, and how patients respond to these. Our results largely complemented clinical guidelines, providing further detail on how they can best be delivered in practice. However, one recommended practice - linking a patient's health concerns and their health behaviours - was shown to receive variable responses and to often generate resistance displays.
Health behaviour change talk is smoothly initiated, conducted, and terminated by clinicians and this rarely causes interactional difficulty. However, initiating conversations by linking a person's current health concern with their health behaviour can lead to resistance to advice, while other strategies such as capitalising on patient initiated discussions, or collaborating through question-answer sequences, may be well received.
临床指南敦促临床医生鼓励患者改善健康行为。然而,大多数指南在实践中都很少提供如何进行这些对话的支持。临床医生担心健康行为改变谈话会给医患双方带来互动困难和不适。本综述旨在确定医疗保健专业人员如何最好地与患者就健康行为改变(HBC)进行沟通。
我们纳入了使用会话分析或话语分析来研究医疗保健专业人员和患者之间记录的互动的研究。我们遵循聚合主题综合方法。这涉及对纳入研究的结果和讨论部分进行逐行编码,以及对描述性主题进行归纳发展和层次分组。顶级主题的组织反映了它们的会话定位。
通过系统搜索共确定了 17562 项研究,其中 10 项研究被纳入。分析产生了 10 个顶级描述性主题,分为三个领域:启动;进行;以及结束健康行为改变谈话。启动的三种方法中有两种促进了进一步的讨论,有一种则直接引起了抵触。在两种进行行为改变谈话的方法中,有一种只引起了患者的轻微反应。一种结束谈话的方式被识别出来,但患者似乎对此没有积极的反应。结果展示了一系列临床医生在谈论 HBC 时使用的具体会话实践,以及患者对此的反应。我们的结果在很大程度上补充了临床指南,提供了关于如何在实践中最好地实施这些指南的更多细节。然而,一种推荐的做法——将患者的健康问题与其健康行为联系起来——被证明会引起不同的反应,并经常引起抵触。
健康行为改变谈话由临床医生平稳启动、进行和结束,这很少引起互动困难。然而,通过将一个人的当前健康问题与他们的健康行为联系起来来启动对话可能会导致对建议的抵触,而其他策略,如利用患者发起的讨论,或通过问答序列进行合作,可能会受到欢迎。