Drew Michael R, Fairhurst Stephen, Malapani Chara, Horvitz Jon C, Balsam Peter D
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003 Apr;75(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00036-4.
Rats were trained on a two-interval (12 and 36 s) temporal production task (the peak procedure). Test sessions were conducted in which either the D(1) antagonist SCH-23390 (SCH; 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 mg/kg) or the D(2) antagonist haloperidol (HAL; 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) were injected prior to testing. Both drugs affected the amount of responding, but only HAL affected timing. Under HAL, both intervals were overestimated, consistent with a HAL-induced decrease in clock speed. Drug-induced decreases in response output were more profound for the long interval than the short. In addition, there was evidence of HAL- and SCH-induced delays in response initiation that were more severe for the long interval, perhaps owing to its status as a weaker conditioned stimulus.
大鼠接受了一个双间隔(12秒和36秒)的时间产生任务(峰值程序)训练。进行了测试环节,在测试前分别注射D(1)拮抗剂SCH-23390(SCH;0.02、0.04、0.06毫克/千克)或D(2)拮抗剂氟哌啶醇(HAL;0.05、0.1、0.2毫克/千克)。两种药物都影响反应量,但只有HAL影响计时。在HAL作用下,两个间隔都被高估,这与HAL引起的时钟速度降低一致。药物引起的反应输出减少在长间隔比短间隔更显著。此外,有证据表明HAL和SCH引起的反应起始延迟在长间隔更严重,这可能是由于长间隔作为较弱条件刺激的状态所致。