Fowler S C, Liou J R
Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University 38677.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jun;115(1-2):24-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02244747.
In an experiment designed to distinguish between the behavioral consequences of treatment with SCH-23390, a D1 dopamine receptor blocker, and raclopride, a D2 antagonist, rats were trained to perform a water-reinforced forelimb operant response. Response rate and the duration of each forelimb contact with the operandum were recorded. In addition, the durations of the rat's visits to the reward well were detected by a photobeam which was blocked by the rat's muzzle as it remained at the reward well. In a between-groups dosing design, separate groups of rats (11-13 rats/group) received SCH-23390 (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12 mg/kg, IP, 30 min) or raclopride (0. 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mg/kg, IP, 30 min) for 21 consecutive days. Quantitative analyses indicated that for comparable amounts of operant rate reduction, raclopride had a significantly greater tendency than SCH-23390 to increase the duration of operant responses and to increase the maximum muzzle entry duration (i.e., to induce microcatalepsy). The results support the idea that at relatively low doses D2 antagonism is more likely than D1 antagonism to produce effects identified preclinically with extrapyramidal side effects.
在一项旨在区分D1多巴胺受体阻断剂SCH - 23390和D2拮抗剂雷氯必利治疗的行为后果的实验中,大鼠被训练进行水强化的前肢操作性反应。记录反应率和每次前肢与操作装置接触的持续时间。此外,通过一个光束检测大鼠在奖励孔的停留时间,当大鼠的口鼻部停留在奖励孔时,光束会被阻断。在组间给药设计中,将大鼠分成不同组(每组11 - 13只大鼠),连续21天分别给予SCH - 23390(0、0.01、0.02、0.04、0.08、0.12毫克/千克,腹腔注射,30分钟)或雷氯必利(0、0.05、0.1、0.2、0.4、0.8毫克/千克,腹腔注射,30分钟)。定量分析表明,对于相当程度的操作率降低,雷氯必利比SCH - 23390更有显著倾向增加操作反应的持续时间和增加最大口鼻部进入持续时间(即诱发微僵住症)。结果支持这样一种观点,即在相对低剂量时,D2拮抗作用比D1拮抗作用更有可能产生临床前鉴定出的锥体外系副作用相关的效应。