Tausz Michael, Wonisch Astrid, Grill Dieter, Morales Domingo, Jiménez Maria Soledad
Institut für Pflanzenphysiologie, University of Graz, Schubertstrasse 51, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
J Exp Bot. 2003 Jun;54(387):1505-10. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg175.
Biochemical measurements of antioxidants and protective pigments have been successfully introduced as markers of environmental stress in field studies (mainly forest studies). A guideline for field sampling and analysis methods is required to allow better comparison of data from different studies. The present review paper recommends HPLC methods for the analysis of ascorbate and glutathione (in oxidized and reduced form), tocopherols, and chloroplast pigments. Methodological variations are substantially lower (coefficients of variance of repeated extractions typically 4-9%) than biological variations of field samples (typical variation coefficients 8-36%), hence special emphasis is put on considerations of sampling standardization in the field with respect to sample time (seasonal and diurnal) and representative sampling of individuals and tissues. Following the suggestions in this paper would enable researchers to produce results that could be compared with those of several forest studies on conifers published in recent years. A larger data-set available for multivariate statistical evaluations (e.g. principal component analysis and cluster analysis) will enhance the diagnostic value of such investigations.
在野外研究(主要是森林研究)中,抗氧化剂和保护性色素的生化测量已成功用作环境胁迫的指标。需要一份野外采样和分析方法指南,以便更好地比较不同研究的数据。本综述文章推荐采用高效液相色谱法分析抗坏血酸和谷胱甘肽(氧化型和还原型)、生育酚以及叶绿体色素。方法学差异远低于野外样本的生物学差异(重复提取的变异系数通常为4 - 9%,而野外样本的典型变异系数为8 - 36%),因此特别强调在野外采样标准化方面要考虑样本时间(季节和昼夜)以及个体和组织的代表性采样。遵循本文中的建议将使研究人员能够得出可与近年来发表的几项关于针叶树的森林研究结果相比较的结果。可用于多变量统计评估(如主成分分析和聚类分析)的更大数据集将提高此类调查的诊断价值。