Kalk Andreas
GTZ Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Cad Saude Publica. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2):663-6. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2003000200033. Epub 2003 May 15.
The proliferation of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) can be considered the result of the inability of the current democratic system to perform all the tasks desired by its citizens. Although NGOs often do quite positive work, they tend to diminish governmental power and are capable of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. In this context, there are efforts to control their activities, and this control can produce both negative effects (blocking the defense of human rights) and positive ones (correcting the lack of coordination in the work by NGOs). NGOs working with the control of leprosy have a long history of cooperation with "host" states in Latin America. In the worst cases they work in a vacuum left by the state. In a country like Brazil, where the government prioritizes the control of Hansen disease and community participation in the political process - NGOs generally work "in harmony" with national authorities. The most useful contribution to state efforts has been the technical and financial support for training health personnel, supervision, and awareness-raising campaigns. Thus, the NGO becomes "quasi-governmental" in performing its tasks.
非政府组织(NGOs)的激增可以被视为当前民主制度无法履行其公民期望的所有任务的结果。尽管非政府组织常常开展非常积极的工作,但它们往往会削弱政府权力,并且有能力干涉其他国家的内政。在这种情况下,人们正在努力控制它们的活动,而这种控制可能会产生负面影响(阻碍人权捍卫)和正面影响(纠正非政府组织工作中缺乏协调的问题)。从事麻风病防治工作的非政府组织在拉丁美洲与“东道国”有着长期的合作历史。在最糟糕的情况下,它们在国家留下的空白中开展工作。在像巴西这样政府将汉森病防治和社区参与政治进程作为优先事项的国家,非政府组织通常与国家当局“和谐”合作。对国家努力最有用的贡献是在培训卫生人员、监督和提高认识运动方面提供技术和财政支持。因此,非政府组织在履行其任务时变得“准政府化”。