Gilson L, Sen P D, Mohammed S, Mujinja P
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Mar;9(1):14-24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.1.14.
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have increasingly been promoted as alternative health care providers to the state, furthering the same goals but less hampered by government inefficiencies and resource constraints. However, the reality of NGO health care provision is more complex. Not only is the distinction between government and NGO providers sometimes difficult to determine because of their operational integration, but NGOs may also suffer from resource constraionts and management inefficiencies similar to those of government providers. Some registered NGOs operate as for-profit providers in practice. Policy development must reflect the strengths and weaknesses of NGOs in particular settings and should be built on NGO advantages over government in terms of resource mobilization, efficiency and/or quality. Policy development will always require a strong government presence in co-ordinating and regulating health care provision, and an NGO sector responsive to the policy goals of government.
非政府组织(NGOs)越来越多地被宣传为国家医疗保健服务的替代提供者,它们追求相同的目标,但较少受到政府低效和资源限制的阻碍。然而,非政府组织提供医疗保健服务的实际情况更为复杂。由于政府与非政府组织提供者在运营上的整合,有时很难区分两者,而且非政府组织也可能面临与政府提供者类似的资源限制和管理低效问题。一些注册的非政府组织在实际运作中作为营利性提供者。政策制定必须反映非政府组织在特定环境中的优势和劣势,并且应该基于非政府组织在资源调动、效率和/或质量方面相对于政府的优势。政策制定始终需要政府强有力地参与协调和监管医疗保健服务的提供,以及一个响应政府政策目标的非政府组织部门。