Taylor Andrea B, Groves Colin P
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3907, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2003 May;44(5):529-61. doi: 10.1016/s0047-2484(03)00027-7.
Pan and Gorilla taxonomy is currently in a state of flux, with the number of existing species and subspecies of common chimpanzee and gorilla having been recently challenged. While Pan and Gorilla systematics have been evaluated on the basis of craniometric and odontometric data, only a handful of studies have evaluated multivariate craniometric variation within P. troglodytes, and none have evaluated in detail mandibular variation in either P. troglodytes or Gorilla gorilla. In this paper, we examine ontogenetic and adult mandibular variation in Pan and Gorilla. We test the hypothesis that patterns and degrees of mandibular variation in Pan and Gorilla closely correspond to those derived from previous analyses of craniometric variation. We then use these data to address some current issues surrounding Pan and Gorilla taxonomy. Specifically, we evaluate the purported distinctiveness of P.t. verus from the other two subspecies of Pan troglodytes, and the recent proposals to recognize Nigerian gorillas as a distinct subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli, and to acknowledge mountain and lowland gorillas as two separate species. Overall, patterns and degrees of multivariate mandibular differentiation parallel those obtained previously for the cranium and dentition. Thus, differences among the three conventionally recognized gorilla subspecies are somewhat greater than among subspecies of common chimpanzees, but differences between P. paniscus and P. troglodytes are greater than those observed between any gorilla subspecies. In this regard, the mandible does not appear to be more variable, or of less taxonomic value, than the face and other parts of the cranium. There are, however, some finer differences in the pattern and degree of morphological differentiation in Pan and Gorilla, both with respect to cranial and dental morphology, and in terms of the application and manner of size adjustment. Mandibular differentiation supports the conventional separation of bonobos from chimpanzees regardless of size adjustment, but size correction alters the relative alignment of taxa. Following size correction, intergroup distances are greatest between P.t. verus and all other groups, but there is considerable overlap amongst chimpanzee subspecies. Amongst gorillas, the greatest separation is between eastern and western gorillas, but adjustment relative to palatal vs. basicranial length results in a greater accuracy of group classification for G.g. gorilla and G.g. graueri, and more equivalent intergroup distances amongst all gorilla groups. We find no multivariate differentiation of the Nigerian gorillas based on mandibular morphology, suggesting that the primary difference between Nigerian and other western lowland gorillas lies in the nuchal region. Though intergroup distances are greatest between P.t. verus and other chimpanzee subspecies, the degree of overlap amongst all three groups does not indicate a markedly greater degree of distinction in mandibular, as opposed to other morphologies. Finally, mandibular differentiation corroborates previous craniodental studies indicating the greatest distinction amongst gorillas is between eastern and western groups. Thus, patterns and degrees of mandibular variation are in agreement with other kinds of data that have been used to diagnose eastern and western gorillas as separate species.
黑猩猩属(Pan)和大猩猩属(Gorilla)的分类目前处于不断变化的状态,普通黑猩猩和大猩猩现有物种及亚种的数量最近受到了挑战。虽然已经基于颅骨测量和牙齿测量数据对黑猩猩属和大猩猩属的系统分类进行了评估,但只有少数研究评估了黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的多变量颅骨测量变异,而且没有一项研究详细评估了黑猩猩或大猩猩的下颌变异。在本文中,我们研究了黑猩猩属和大猩猩属个体发育过程中和成年后的下颌变异。我们检验了这样一个假设:黑猩猩属和大猩猩属下颌变异的模式和程度与先前从颅骨测量变异分析中得出的模式和程度密切对应。然后,我们利用这些数据来解决当前围绕黑猩猩属和大猩猩属分类的一些问题。具体而言,我们评估了西非黑猩猩(P.t. verus)与黑猩猩属其他两个亚种所谓的独特性,以及最近将尼日利亚大猩猩认定为一个独特亚种——克罗斯河大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla diehli),并将山地大猩猩和低地大猩猩视为两个独立物种的提议。总体而言,多变量下颌分化的模式和程度与先前在颅骨和牙齿方面获得的结果相似。因此,传统上认可的三个大猩猩亚种之间的差异略大于普通黑猩猩亚种之间的差异,但倭黑猩猩(P. paniscus)和黑猩猩之间的差异大于在任何大猩猩亚种之间观察到的差异。在这方面,下颌似乎并不比颅骨的面部和其他部分更具变异性,或分类价值更低。然而,在黑猩猩属和大猩猩属中,无论是在颅骨和牙齿形态方面,还是在大小调整的应用和方式方面,形态分化的模式和程度都存在一些更细微的差异。下颌分化支持将倭黑猩猩与黑猩猩按传统方式分开,无论是否进行大小调整,但大小校正会改变分类单元的相对排列。进行大小校正后,西非黑猩猩与所有其他群体之间的组间距离最大,但黑猩猩亚种之间存在相当大的重叠。在大猩猩中,最大的差异存在于东部大猩猩和西部大猩猩之间,但相对于腭长与颅底长进行调整会使对西部大猩猩指名亚种(G.g.gorilla)和东部大猩猩指名亚种(G.g.graueri)的群体分类更准确,并且所有大猩猩群体之间的组间距离更接近。基于下颌形态,我们没有发现尼日利亚大猩猩存在多变量分化,这表明尼日利亚大猩猩与其他西部低地大猩猩之间的主要差异在于项部区域。虽然西非黑猩猩与其他黑猩猩亚种之间的组间距离最大,但与其他形态相比,所有三个群体之间的重叠程度并未表明下颌存在明显更大程度的差异。最后,下颌分化证实了先前的颅齿研究结果,即大猩猩之间最大的差异存在于东部群体和西部群体之间。因此,下颌变异的模式和程度与其他用于将东部大猩猩和西部大猩猩诊断为不同物种的数据一致。