Ritchie C W, Chiu E, Harrigan S, Hall K, Hassett A, Macfarlane S, Mastwyk M, O'Connor D W, Opie J, Ames D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 May;18(5):432-40. doi: 10.1002/gps.862.
Atypical antipsychotics are commonly used in the management of schizophrenia in late life with evidence suggesting they induce lower rates of motor disturbance, but have similar efficacy to conventional antipsychotics. Trials in the elderly have been either retrospective, small, of short duration or of a single-arm design.
To demonstrate the effects upon motor side-effects, efficacy, safety and quality of life (QOL) of switching elderly patients with schizophrenia from conventional antipsychotics to olanzapine or risperidone.
Elderly patients with schizophrenia were randomly allocated to olanzapine or risperidone and followed through an open-label crossover period. Between and within group intention to treat analyses were conducted.
66 patients were randomised (mean age 69.6 [SD +/- 6.2]). Four (11.8%) patients on olanzapine and 8 (26.7%) patients on risperidone failed to complete the crossover because of treatment failure [Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.73[0.73-10.2] p = 0.14]. The mean doses upon completion of switching in each arm were 9.9 mg (SD = 4.2) and 1.7 mg (SD = 1.2) for olanzapine and risperidone respectively. In both arms there was improvement in Parkinsonism, though only olanzapine was associated with a reduction in dyskinetic symptoms. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Scale for the assessment of Negative Symptoms and Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores all improved through the crossover period in both arms with no between group differences. Treatment with olanzapine was associated with a better response over risperidone on the psychological domain of the World Health Organisation-Quality Of Life [Brief] (WHO-QOL-BREF) scale ( p = 0.02). Patients in the olanzapine arm also demonstrated improvement from baseline in the WHO-QOL-BREF physical, psychological and health satisfaction domains, but risperidone had no effect on any Quality of Life (QOL) measure.
After switching from a conventional antipsychotic, olanzapine and risperidone were associated with improvement in core symptoms of schizophrenia and motor side effects. Subjects switched to olanzapine were more likely to complete the switching process and show an improvement in psychological QOL.
非典型抗精神病药物常用于老年精神分裂症的治疗,有证据表明其引发运动障碍的几率较低,但疗效与传统抗精神病药物相似。针对老年人的试验多为回顾性、规模小、持续时间短或单臂设计。
证明将老年精神分裂症患者从传统抗精神病药物换用奥氮平或利培酮对运动副作用、疗效、安全性及生活质量(QOL)的影响。
将老年精神分裂症患者随机分配至奥氮平组或利培酮组,并经历一个开放标签的交叉期。进行组间和组内意向性治疗分析。
66例患者被随机分组(平均年龄69.6[标准差±6.2])。奥氮平组有4例(11.8%)患者和利培酮组有8例(26.7%)患者因治疗失败未完成交叉期[优势比(OR)=2.73[0.73 - 10.2],p = 0.14]。每组换药完成时的平均剂量,奥氮平为9.9毫克(标准差 = 4.2),利培酮为1.7毫克(标准差 = 1.2)。两组的帕金森症均有改善,不过只有奥氮平与运动障碍症状减轻有关。简明精神病评定量表、阴性症状评定量表及蒙哥马利 - 阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表的评分在两组交叉期内均有所改善,组间无差异。在世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHO - QOL - BREF)的心理领域,奥氮平治疗比利培酮有更好的反应(p = 0.02)。奥氮平组患者在WHO - QOL - BREF的身体、心理和健康满意度领域也较基线有所改善,但利培酮对任何生活质量(QOL)指标均无影响。
从传统抗精神病药物换用后,奥氮平和利培酮与精神分裂症核心症状及运动副作用的改善有关。换用奥氮平的受试者更有可能完成换药过程,并在心理生活质量方面有所改善。