Müller Th, Benz S, Börnke C, Russ H, Przuntek H
Department of Neurology, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2003 Jun;110(6):603-9. doi: 10.1007/s00702-003-0815-y.
Clinicians use acute challenges with levodopa (LD) and/or apomorphine (A) for diagnostic dopaminergic response tests in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. We consecutively compared the value of both drugs with performance of repeated ratings and adverse effect recording. Oral administration of 200 mg LD was superior to subcutaneous injection of 4 mg A in terms of tolerability and onset of temporary UPDRS motor score decline ([previously untreated PD patients] LD: 4.02 [mean] +/- 2.45 [SD] [significant decrease: p = 1.42 E-07] vs. A: 1.58 +/- 3.38 [not significant decrease: p = 0.14], p = 0.0009; [treated PD patients] LD: 7.71 +/- 4.35 [significant decrease: p = 2.48 E-06] vs. A: 5.19 +/- 4.32 [significant decrease: p = 7.83 E-05], p = 0.07). We suggest diagnostic acute challenge test performance with LD as first- and A as second choice due to better tolerability and valuation in combination with repeated scoring procedures to improve sensitivity and specifity.
临床医生使用左旋多巴(LD)和/或阿扑吗啡(A)进行急性激发试验,用于帕金森病(PD)患者的多巴胺能反应诊断测试。我们连续比较了这两种药物的价值,并进行了重复评分和不良反应记录。就耐受性和临时统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)运动评分下降的起效情况而言,口服200毫克LD优于皮下注射4毫克A([未经治疗的PD患者] LD:4.02 [平均值] +/- 2.45 [标准差] [显著下降:p = 1.42 E - 07] 对比 A:1.58 +/- 3.38 [无显著下降:p = 0.14],p = 0.0009;[接受治疗的PD患者] LD:7.71 +/- 4.35 [显著下降:p = 2.48 E - 06] 对比 A:5.19 +/- 4.32 [显著下降:p = 7.83 E - 05],p = 0.07)。由于耐受性更好,且与重复评分程序相结合进行评估可提高敏感性和特异性,我们建议将LD作为首选、A作为次选进行诊断性急性激发试验。