Veeramachaneni Ravindra, Nordberg Mary L, Shi Runhua, Herrera Guillermo A, Turbat-Herrera Elba A
Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Jun;28(6):301-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.10291.
Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility of performing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on routine urine samples and to compare the relative sensitivities of urine cytology and FISH for detecting urothelial carcinoma. Light microscopy (LM) using cytologic evaluation and FISH were used to study 121 consecutive urine samples. A mixture of fluorescent probes to chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and the 9p21 locus were used for detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities (UroVysion, Vysis/Abbott). Biopsy specimens from patients in the study were reviewed if available. FISH analysis was performed without knowledge of cytology or biopsy findings. The urine cytology of 121 samples was interpreted as 59 negative, 41 reactive, 16 atypical, 2 suspicious and 3 insufficient cells for diagnosis. 85 samples were successfully analyzed by FISH. Thirty-one of these showed chromosomal abnormalities and these samples were initially regarded on the original cytology reading as follows: 10 negative, 10 reactive, 9 atypical, and 2 suspicious. FISH demonstrated chromosomal abnormalities in a significant number of cases (67%) that were initially diagnosed as normal or reactive by LM. Twenty-five patients were identified who had biopsy-proven TCC and successful FISH. Thirteen of the 25 patients (52%) were abnormal by FISH (cytology: 2 suspicious, 6 atypical, 4 reactive, 1 negative). One patient was atypical by cytology with normal FISH results but had TCC on biopsy. Hyperdiploidy for chromosomes 3 (77%) and 7 (67%) were seen consistently. Multiple chromosomal abnormalities were seen in 67% of these cases. We conclude that FISH has a greater sensitivity in detecting urothelial carcinoma when coupled with urine cytology. It is not entirely clear at this time whether a positive FISH may indicate frank neoplastic urothelial transformation or merely be an indicator of unstable urothelium capable of or primed for malignant transformation thus detecting patients at significant risk. The use of FISH in conjunction with urine cytology can potentially reduce urothelial carcinoma morbidity and mortality by diagnosing these tumors earlier.
我们的目的是评估在常规尿液样本上进行荧光原位杂交(FISH)的可行性,并比较尿液细胞学检查和FISH检测尿路上皮癌的相对敏感性。使用细胞学评估的光学显微镜(LM)和FISH对121份连续尿液样本进行研究。使用针对染色体3、7、17和9p21位点的荧光探针混合物检测染色体数目异常(UroVysion,Vysis/雅培)。如有可能,对研究中患者的活检标本进行复查。FISH分析在不知道细胞学或活检结果的情况下进行。121份样本的尿液细胞学检查结果为59份阴性、41份反应性、16份非典型、2份可疑和3份诊断细胞不足。85份样本成功进行了FISH分析。其中31份显示染色体异常,这些样本在最初的细胞学检查报告中分类如下:10份阴性、10份反应性、9份非典型和2份可疑。FISH在大量最初被LM诊断为正常或反应性的病例(67%)中显示出染色体异常。确定了25例经活检证实为移行细胞癌(TCC)且FISH检测成功的患者。25例患者中有13例(52%)FISH结果异常(细胞学检查:2份可疑、6份非典型、4份反应性、1份阴性)。1例患者细胞学检查为非典型但FISH结果正常,但活检显示为TCC。一致观察到染色体3(77%)和7(67%)的超二倍体。这些病例中有67%出现多个染色体异常。我们得出结论,FISH与尿液细胞学检查相结合时,在检测尿路上皮癌方面具有更高的敏感性。目前尚不完全清楚FISH阳性是否可能表明存在明显的肿瘤性尿路上皮转化,还是仅仅是不稳定尿路上皮的一个指标,表明其有能力或已准备好发生恶性转化,从而检测出具有重大风险的患者。FISH与尿液细胞学检查联合使用有可能通过更早地诊断这些肿瘤来降低尿路上皮癌的发病率和死亡率。