Suppr超能文献

小鼠味觉偏好测试:为什么只用两个瓶子?

Mouse taste preference tests: why only two bottles?

作者信息

Tordoff Michael G, Bachmanov Alexander A

机构信息

Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA.

出版信息

Chem Senses. 2003 May;28(4):315-24. doi: 10.1093/chemse/28.4.315.

Abstract

Two-bottle tests have been used extensively to measure the preference for taste and nutrient solutions but there has been little work with tests involving more than two bottles. Here, we compare the results obtained in two-bottle tests with those obtained in three- and six-bottle tests. In Experiment 1, we measured the preferences for 2 mM saccharin, 50 mM citric acid, 0.3 mM quinine hydrochloride and 75 mM NaCl displayed by 129X1/SvJ (129) and C57BL/6J (B6) mice. Mice drank more taste solution when they received two bottles providing taste solution and one providing water than when they received either a standard two-bottle test or two bottles providing water and one providing taste solution. The three-bottle tests also revealed the left spout side preferences of the 129 strain and were generally better at distinguishing between the 129 and B6 strains (i.e. were more sensitive) than were the two-bottle tests. In Experiment 2, we measured intakes and preferences in tests with six bottles, with one, two, three, four or five containing 75 mM NaCl and the rest containing water. NaCl preferences were monotonically related to the number of NaCl spouts available. A follow-up experiment found similar results whether the index of ingestion was volume intakes or licks. This argues that spillage cannot account for the effect of spout number on taste solution intake. Together, the results suggest that (i) the number of bottles of taste solution and water has a profound influence on taste solution intake and preference, and (ii) three-bottle tests may be more sensitive than two-bottle tests in many circumstances.

摘要

双瓶测试已被广泛用于测量对味觉和营养溶液的偏好,但涉及多于两个瓶子的测试研究较少。在此,我们比较了双瓶测试与三瓶和六瓶测试所得的结果。在实验1中,我们测量了129X1/SvJ(129)和C57BL/6J(B6)小鼠对2 mM糖精、50 mM柠檬酸、0.3 mM盐酸奎宁和75 mM氯化钠的偏好。当小鼠接受两瓶提供味觉溶液和一瓶提供水的组合时,它们饮用的味觉溶液比接受标准双瓶测试或两瓶提供水和一瓶提供味觉溶液时更多。三瓶测试还揭示了129品系小鼠对左侧喷嘴的偏好,并且在区分129和B6品系方面通常比双瓶测试表现更好(即更敏感)。在实验2中,我们在六瓶测试中测量摄入量和偏好,其中一、二、三、四或五瓶含有75 mM氯化钠,其余含有水。对氯化钠的偏好与可用氯化钠喷嘴的数量呈单调相关。后续实验发现,无论摄入指标是体积摄入量还是舔舐次数,结果都相似。这表明溢出不能解释喷嘴数量对味觉溶液摄入量的影响。综合来看,结果表明:(i)味觉溶液和水瓶的数量对味觉溶液摄入量和偏好有深远影响;(ii)在许多情况下,三瓶测试可能比双瓶测试更敏感。

相似文献

1
Mouse taste preference tests: why only two bottles?
Chem Senses. 2003 May;28(4):315-24. doi: 10.1093/chemse/28.4.315.
2
Taste solution preferences of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice: influence of age, sex, and diet.
Chem Senses. 2007 Sep;32(7):655-71. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjm034. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
4
Influence of test duration on the sensitivity of the two-bottle choice test.
Chem Senses. 2002 Nov;27(9):759-68. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.9.759.
5
Chorda tympani responses in two inbred strains of mice with different taste preferences.
Physiol Behav. 1999 Aug;67(2):287-97. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00071-2.
6
Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Physiol Behav. 2012 Jan 18;105(2):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
7
Sapid solutions and food intake in repeated dehydration and rehydration periods in rats.
Exp Physiol. 2001 Jul;86(4):489-98. doi: 10.1113/eph8602167.
8
Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
Physiol Behav. 2007 Mar 16;90(4):602-11. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
10
Development of altered taste preferences in tumor-bearing rats.
Appetite. 1994 Dec;23(3):219-30. doi: 10.1006/appe.1994.1055.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing preference testing in humans and animals.
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 6;57(7):193. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02668-5.
2
The alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist PHA-543613 reduces food intake in male rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Apr;237:173723. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173723. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
Efficacy of Supplemental Diet Gels for Preventing Postoperative Weight Loss in Mice ( ).
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 1;62(1):87-91. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS22-000030. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
5
Why Taste Is Pharmacology.
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;275:1-31. doi: 10.1007/164_2022_589.
8
CRISPR disruption and UK Biobank analysis of a highly conserved polymorphic enhancer suggests a role in male anxiety and ethanol intake.
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;26(6):2263-2276. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0707-7. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Ethanol Conditioned Taste Aversion in High Drinking in the Dark Mice.
Brain Sci. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):2. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9010002.
10
A novel quantified bitterness evaluation model for traditional Chinese herbs based on an animal ethology principle.
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2018 Mar;8(2):209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Influence of the number of alcohol and water bottles on murine alcohol intake.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Apr;27(4):600-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000060529.30157.38.
3
Food intake, water intake, and drinking spout side preference of 28 mouse strains.
Behav Genet. 2002 Nov;32(6):435-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1020884312053.
4
Influence of test duration on the sensitivity of the two-bottle choice test.
Chem Senses. 2002 Nov;27(9):759-68. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.9.759.
6
Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited.
Physiol Behav. 2002 Aug;76(4-5):633-44. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00785-0.
7
Obesity by choice: the powerful influence of nutrient availability on nutrient intake.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 May;282(5):R1536-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00739.2001.
9
Functional genomics in the mouse: phenotype-based mutagenesis screens.
Genome Res. 1998 Jul;8(7):698-710. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.7.698.
10
Voluntary sodium chloride consumption by mice: differences among five inbred strains.
Behav Genet. 1998 Mar;28(2):117-24. doi: 10.1023/a:1021471924143.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验