• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与年轻患者相比,75岁及以上患者腹主动脉瘤破裂修复后的结局和生存率:这些结果是否证明付出的努力是值得的?

Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?

作者信息

Shahidi S, Schroeder T Veith, Carstensen M, Sillesen H

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.009
PMID:19136232
Abstract

We evaluated early mortality (<30 days) rates, cost analyses, and preoperative variables that may be predictive of 30-day mortality in elderly patients compared to younger patients after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). The survey is a retrospective analysis based on prospectively registered data. The protocol was an "all-comers" policy. Seventy-two patients, who were operated on for RAAA in our department from January 1, 2005, to December 30, 2005, are included in this study. The follow-up time of survivors was 1 year. We defined 75-year-old patients as elderly because of the increased incidence of surgical risk factors and hospital mortality in this subset of patients (cut-off age). Demographic, clinical, and operative factors were analyzed together with 30-day mortality. Univariate analysis was performed with the chi-squared test. Multivariate analyses were also performed with the variables that were found to be significant in the univariate analysis. Health economy and cost analysis for the two groups were estimated. Out of 72 open repairs of RAAA, 44 patients (61%) were under 75 years of age and 28 (39%) were 75 years or older. The average age of the patients was 71 years (confidence interval [CI] 69.2-73.7, range 53-87). Twenty-five patients (35%, CI 27.6-51.2) died within 30 days in the postoperative period. The 30-day mortality for the 28 elderly patients who underwent open operative repair was 16 (57%, CI 48%-72%) compared to 9 (20%, CI 12%-33%) of 44 younger patients (p < 0.001). An age of 75 years or older and a serum creatinine >or=0.150 mmol/L in elderly patients with RAAA (p < 0.01) were identified to be significant risk factors for operative mortality. We did not encounter significant differences in the distribution of other risk factors in the group of elderly patients compared to the younger group. Between the survivors of the two groups, there were no significant differences in the total length of stay (LOS) and the LOS in the intensive care unit. Advanced age (>or=75) and the combination of this advanced age and serum creatinine of >or=0.150 mmol/L were the only significant (p < 0.05) preoperative risk factors in our single-center study. However, we believe that treatment for RAAA can be justified in elderly patients. In our experience, surgical open repair has been life-saving in 33% of patients aged 75 years and older, at a relatively low price for each life, estimated at euro 40,409.

摘要

我们评估了老年患者与年轻患者在急诊开放性修复破裂腹主动脉瘤(RAAA)后30天内的早期死亡率(<30天)、成本分析以及可能预测30天死亡率的术前变量。该调查是基于前瞻性登记数据的回顾性分析。研究方案为“所有患者皆纳入”政策。本研究纳入了2005年1月1日至2005年12月30日在我院接受RAAA手术的72例患者。幸存者的随访时间为1年。由于该年龄段患者手术风险因素和医院死亡率增加(临界年龄),我们将75岁及以上患者定义为老年患者。对人口统计学、临床和手术因素以及30天死亡率进行了分析。采用卡方检验进行单因素分析。还对在单因素分析中发现具有显著性的变量进行了多因素分析。对两组进行了卫生经济学和成本分析。在72例RAAA开放性修复患者中,44例(61%)年龄在75岁以下,28例(39%)年龄在75岁及以上。患者的平均年龄为71岁(置信区间[CI]69.2 - 73.7,范围53 - 87)。25例患者(35%,CI 27.6 - 51.2)在术后30天内死亡。28例接受开放性手术修复的老年患者的30天死亡率为16例(57%,CI 48% - 72%),而44例年轻患者为9例(20%,CI 12% - 33%)(p < 0.001)。RAAA老年患者年龄在75岁及以上以及血清肌酐≥0.150 mmol/L(p < 0.01)被确定为手术死亡率的显著危险因素。与年轻组相比,我们未发现老年患者组中其他危险因素的分布存在显著差异。两组幸存者之间,总住院时间(LOS)和重症监护病房住院时间无显著差异。在我们的单中心研究中,高龄(≥75岁)以及高龄与血清肌酐≥0.150 mmol/L的组合是仅有的显著(p < 0.

相似文献

1
Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?与年轻患者相比,75岁及以上患者腹主动脉瘤破裂修复后的结局和生存率:这些结果是否证明付出的努力是值得的?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
2
Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001-2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume.美国腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内治疗(2001 - 2006年):与开放修复相比具有显著生存获益,且与机构手术量增加独立相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
3
Outcome in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after open surgical repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤破裂开放手术修复后需要肾脏替代治疗的患者的预后。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Apr;44(3):170-3. doi: 10.1177/1538574410361972.
4
Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.衡量关键指标:机构结局数据优于使用替代指标来定义腹主动脉瘤修复的“卓越中心”。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
5
Abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in a district general hospital: a 15-years experience.地区综合医院的腹主动脉瘤手术:15年经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov;21(6):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.03.022. Epub 2007 May 18.
6
Analysis of outcome after using high-risk criteria selection to surgery versus endovascular repair in the modern era of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment.分析在现代腹主动脉瘤治疗时代,使用高危标准选择手术与血管内修复的结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
7
A new preoperative predictor of outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the time before shock (TBS).腹主动脉瘤破裂预后的一种新的术前预测指标:休克前时间(TBS)。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;24(3):315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Nov 8.
8
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: risk factors for mortality after emergency repair.腹主动脉瘤破裂:急诊修复术后的死亡危险因素。
N Z Med J. 2004 Oct 8;117(1203):U1100.
9
Thirty-day NSQIP database outcomes of open versus endoluminal repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.开放与腔内修复破裂腹主动脉瘤的 30 天 NSQIP 数据库结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;51(2):305-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.086. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
10
Management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the endovascular era.血管内时代腹主动脉瘤破裂的处理。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):9-17; discussion 17-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.038. Epub 2009 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Mortality-Related Factors in Patients Aged >80 Years Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.80岁以上腹主动脉瘤患者死亡相关因素分析
J Chest Surg. 2025 Sep 5;58(5):196-204. doi: 10.5090/jcs.25.003. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
The Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Terms of Safety and Efficacy on the Basis of a Single-Center 30-Year Experience.基于单中心30年经验对破裂腹主动脉瘤血管内治疗与开放手术治疗安全性和有效性的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 20;12(22):7186. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227186.
3
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management in elderly patients with rectal cancer aged 70 and older.
70岁及以上老年直肠癌患者的腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗对比
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Oct-Dec;19(4):504-510. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_243_22.
4
Similar long-term outcomes between endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarian patients: a single-center study.老年患者腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术与开放手术修复的类似长期结果:一项单中心研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Dec;103(6):372-377. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.6.372. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Acute kidney injury in elderly intensive care patients: a review.老年重症监护患者的急性肾损伤:综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Sep;36(9):1454-64. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1957-7. Epub 2010 Jul 15.