Stavreva N A, Stavrev P V, Warkentin B, Fallone B G
Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G1Z2, Canada.
Med Phys. 2003 May;30(5):735-42. doi: 10.1118/1.1567735.
In this work we study the descriptive power of the main tumor control probability (TCP) models based on the linear quadratic (LQ) mechanism of cell damage with cell recovery. The Poisson, binomial, and a dynamic TCP model, developed recently by Zaider and Minerbo are considered. The Zaider-Minerbo model takes cell repopulation into account. It is shown that the Poisson approximation incorporating cell repopulation is conceptually incorrect. Based on the Zaider-Minerbo model, an expression for the TCP for fractionated treatments with varying intervals between two consecutive fractions and with cell survival probability that changes from fraction to fraction is derived. The models are fitted to an experimental data set consisting of dose response curves that correspond to different fractionation regimes. The binomial TCP model based on the LQ mechanism of cell damage solely was unable to fit the fractionated response data. It was found that the Zaider-Minerbo model, which takes tumor cell repopulation into account, best fits the data.
在这项工作中,我们基于具有细胞恢复功能的细胞损伤线性二次(LQ)机制,研究了主要肿瘤控制概率(TCP)模型的描述能力。考虑了泊松模型、二项式模型以及最近由扎伊德(Zaider)和米内尔博(Minerbo)开发的动态TCP模型。扎伊德 - 米内尔博模型考虑了细胞再增殖。结果表明,纳入细胞再增殖的泊松近似在概念上是不正确的。基于扎伊德 - 米内尔博模型,推导了用于分次治疗的TCP表达式,该分次治疗中两个连续分次之间的间隔不同,且每次分次的细胞存活概率也不同。将这些模型拟合到一个实验数据集,该数据集由对应于不同分次照射方案的剂量反应曲线组成。仅基于细胞损伤LQ机制的二项式TCP模型无法拟合分次反应数据。研究发现,考虑肿瘤细胞再增殖的扎伊德 - 米内尔博模型最能拟合数据。