White M F
Centre for Biomolecular Science, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, UK.
Biochem Soc Trans. 2003 Jun;31(Pt 3):690-3. doi: 10.1042/bst0310690..
It is now generally accepted that the Archaea share many similarities in their information-processing pathways with eukarya. Archaeal and eukaryal DNA replication and transcriptional machineries show particularly striking similarities, and the archaeal processes have been used extensively as simpler models of the much more complex eukaryal ones. Archaeal DNA-repair pathways are not yet well characterized, and their relationship with repair pathways in bacteria and eukarya are still open to question. There are also strong distinctions between the major subdivisions crenarchaea and euryarchaea within the archaeal domain. This review highlights some of these similarities and differences using specific examples arising from our studies of the double-stranded and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins and the repair endonuclease XPF in the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus.
现在人们普遍认为古菌在其信息处理途径方面与真核生物有许多相似之处。古菌和真核生物的DNA复制及转录机制表现出特别显著的相似性,并且古菌的这些过程已被广泛用作更为复杂的真核生物过程的简化模型。古菌的DNA修复途径尚未得到很好的表征,它们与细菌和真核生物中的修复途径之间的关系仍有待探讨。在古菌域内的主要分支泉古菌和广古菌之间也存在明显差异。本综述利用我们对嗜热栖热菌中双链和单链DNA结合蛋白以及修复内切核酸酶XPF的研究中的具体实例,突出了其中的一些异同。