Suppr超能文献

铁管理中的安全性。

Safety in iron management.

作者信息

Fishbane Steven

机构信息

Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY 11501, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jun;41(5 Suppl):18-26. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00373-1.

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) iron therapy has become an integral part of hemodialysis management during the past several decades, and the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines recognize that most patients undergoing hemodialysis will require IV iron therapy on a regular basis to reach target hemoglobin (Hgb) levels. There now are three IV iron compounds available in the United States: iron dextran, sodium ferric gluconate, and iron sucrose. Although all have been proven effective for increasing Hgb/hematocrit levels, recent data show differences in their relative safety profiles. During the past two decades, more than 30 deaths have been attributed to the use of IV iron dextran. The two newer compounds available in the United States, sodium ferric gluconate and iron sucrose, have more favorable safety profiles, with the largest prospective safety comparison to date showing sodium ferric gluconate to be similar to placebo in the incidence of serious anaphylactoid-type reactions. This article reviews safety data surrounding the IV iron therapies.

摘要

在过去几十年中,静脉注射铁剂治疗已成为血液透析管理的一个重要组成部分,美国国家肾脏基金会-肾脏病预后质量倡议指南认可,大多数接受血液透析的患者需要定期进行静脉注射铁剂治疗,以达到目标血红蛋白(Hgb)水平。目前在美国有三种静脉注射铁剂化合物可用:右旋糖酐铁、葡萄糖酸铁钠和蔗糖铁。尽管所有这些药物都已被证明对提高血红蛋白/血细胞比容水平有效,但最近的数据显示它们的相对安全性存在差异。在过去二十年中,超过30例死亡归因于使用静脉注射右旋糖酐铁。美国现有的两种较新的化合物,葡萄糖酸铁钠和蔗糖铁,具有更良好的安全性,迄今为止最大规模的前瞻性安全性比较显示,葡萄糖酸铁钠在严重类过敏反应发生率方面与安慰剂相似。本文综述了有关静脉注射铁剂治疗的安全性数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验