Tailor R C, Hanson W F, Ibbott G S
Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Box 547, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003 Spring;4(2):102-11. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v4i2.2524.
The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) is a resource to the medical physics community for assistance regarding dosimetry procedures. Since the publication of the AAPM TG-51 calibration protocol, the RPC has responded to numerous phone calls raising questions and describing areas in the protocol where physicists have had problems. At the beginning of the year 2000, the RPC requested that institutions participating in national clinical trials provide the change in measured beam output resulting from the conversion from the TG-21 protocol to TG-51. So far, the RPC has received the requested data from approximately 150 of the approximately 1300 institutions in the RPC program. The RPC also undertook a comparison of TG-21 and TG-51 and determined the expected change in beam calibration for ion chambers in common use, and for the range of photon and electron beam energies used clinically. Analysis of these data revealed two significant outcomes: (i) a large number (approximately 1/2) of the reported calibration changes for photon and electron beams were outside the RPC's expected values, and (ii) the discrepancies in the reported versus the expected dose changes were as large as 8%. Numerous factors were determined to have contributed to these deviations. The most significant factors involved the use of plane-parallel chambers, the mixing of phantom materials and chambers between the two protocols, and the inconsistent use of depth-dose factors for transfer of dose from the measurement depth to the depth of dose maximum. In response to these observations, the RPC has identified a number of circumstances in which physicists might have difficulty with the protocol, including concerns related to electron calibration at low energies (R50<2 cm), and the use of a cylindrical chamber at 6 MeV electrons. In addition, helpful quantitative hints are presented, including the effect of the prescribed lead filter for photon energy measurements, the impact of shifting the chamber depth for photon depth-dose measurements, and the impact of updated stopping-power data used in TG-51 versus that used in TG-21, particularly for electron calibrations.
放射物理中心(RPC)是医学物理界在剂量测定程序方面寻求协助的一个资源。自美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG - 51校准协议发布以来,RPC接到了无数咨询电话,这些电话提出了问题,并描述了物理学家在该协议中遇到问题的领域。在2000年初,RPC要求参与国家临床试验的机构提供从TG - 21协议转换到TG - 51协议后测量的射束输出变化情况。到目前为止,RPC已从RPC项目中约1300家机构中的约150家收到了所要求的数据。RPC还对TG - 21和TG - 51进行了比较,并确定了常用电离室以及临床使用的光子和电子束能量范围内射束校准的预期变化。对这些数据的分析揭示了两个重要结果:(i)大量(约1/2)报告的光子和电子束校准变化超出了RPC的预期值,(ii)报告的剂量变化与预期剂量变化之间的差异高达8%。已确定有许多因素导致了这些偏差。最主要的因素包括平行板电离室的使用、两种协议之间模体材料和电离室的混用,以及在将剂量从测量深度转移到剂量最大值深度时深度剂量因子的不一致使用。针对这些观察结果,RPC确定了一些物理学家可能在协议方面遇到困难的情况,包括与低能量(R50<2 cm)电子校准相关的问题,以及在6 MeV电子时使用圆柱形电离室的问题。此外,还给出了有用的定量提示,包括规定的铅滤过器对光子能量测量的影响、在光子深度剂量测量中移动电离室深度的影响,以及TG - 51中使用的更新后的阻止本领数据与TG - 21中使用的数据相比的影响,特别是对于电子校准。