Ross Charles L, Dyer Kelly A, Erez Tamar, Miller Susan J, Jaenike John, Markow Therese A
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jul;20(7):1143-57. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg137. Epub 2003 May 30.
Among major taxonomic groups, microsatellites exhibit considerable variation in composition and allele length, but they also show considerable conservation within many major groups. This variation may be explained by slow microsatellite evolution so that all species within a group have similar patterns of variation, or by taxon-specific mutational or selective constraints. Unfortunately, comparing microsatellites across species and studies can be problematic because of biases that may exist among different isolation and analysis protocols. We present microsatellite data from five Drosophila species in the Drosophila subgenus: D. arizonae, D. mojavensis, and D. pachea (three cactophilic species), and D. neotestacea and D. recens (two mycophagous species), all isolated at the same time using identical protocols. For each species, we compared the relative abundance of motifs, the distribution of repeat size, and the average number of repeats. Dimers were the most abundant microsatellites for each species. However, we found considerable variation in the relative abundance of motif size classes among species, even between sister taxa. Frequency differences among motifs within size classes for the three cactophilic species, but not the two mycophagous species, are consistent with other studied Drosophila. Frequency distributions of repeat number, as well as mean size, show significant differences among motif size classes but not across species. Sizes of microsatellites in these five species are consistent with D. virilis, another species in the subgenus Drosophila, but they have consistently higher means than in D. melanogaster, in the subgenus Sophophora. These results confirm that many aspects of microsatellite variation evolve quickly but also are subject to taxon-specific constraints. In addition, the nature of microsatellite evolution is dependent on temporal and taxonomic scales, and some variation is conserved across broad taxonomic levels despite relatively high rates of mutation for these loci.
在主要的分类类群中,微卫星在组成和等位基因长度上表现出相当大的差异,但在许多主要类群内部也表现出相当程度的保守性。这种差异可能是由于微卫星进化缓慢,以至于一个类群内的所有物种都有相似的变异模式,或者是由于特定分类群的突变或选择限制。不幸的是,由于不同的分离和分析方案之间可能存在偏差,跨物种和研究比较微卫星可能会有问题。我们展示了果蝇亚属中五个果蝇物种的微卫星数据:亚利桑那果蝇、莫哈韦果蝇和帕切亚果蝇(三种嗜仙人掌物种),以及新测试果蝇和 recens 果蝇(两种食真菌物种),所有这些都是使用相同方案同时分离得到的。对于每个物种,我们比较了基序相对丰度、重复序列大小分布和重复序列平均数量。二核苷酸是每个物种中最丰富的微卫星。然而,我们发现物种间基序大小类别的相对丰度存在相当大的差异,即使是姐妹分类群之间也是如此。三种嗜仙人掌物种(而非两种食真菌物种)中大小类内基序之间的频率差异与其他已研究的果蝇一致。重复序列数量的频率分布以及平均大小在基序大小类别之间存在显著差异,但在物种之间没有。这五个物种中微卫星的大小与果蝇亚属中的另一个物种粗壮果蝇一致,但它们的平均值始终高于 Sophophora 亚属中的黑腹果蝇。这些结果证实,微卫星变异的许多方面进化迅速,但也受到特定分类群的限制。此外,微卫星进化的性质取决于时间和分类尺度,尽管这些位点的突变率相对较高,但一些变异在广泛的分类水平上是保守的。