Savageau Michael A.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, 5641 Medical Science Building II, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0620.
Chaos. 2001 Mar;11(1):142-159. doi: 10.1063/1.1349892.
The control of gene expression involves complex circuits that exhibit enormous variation in design. For years the most convenient explanation for these variations was historical accident. According to this view, evolution is a haphazard process in which many different designs are generated by chance; there are many ways to accomplish the same thing, and so no further meaning can be attached to such different but equivalent designs. In recent years a more satisfying explanation based on design principles has been found for at least certain aspects of gene circuitry. By design principle we mean a rule that characterizes some biological feature exhibited by a class of systems such that discovery of the rule allows one not only to understand known instances but also to predict new instances within the class. The central importance of gene regulation in modern molecular biology provides strong motivation to search for more of these underlying design principles. The search is in its infancy and there are undoubtedly many design principles that remain to be discovered. The focus of this three-part review will be the class of elementary gene circuits in bacteria. The first part reviews several elements of design that enter into the characterization of elementary gene circuits in prokaryotic organisms. Each of these elements exhibits a variety of realizations whose meaning is generally unclear. The second part reviews mathematical methods used to represent, analyze, and compare alternative designs. Emphasis is placed on particular methods that have been used successfully to identify design principles for elementary gene circuits. The third part reviews four design principles that make specific predictions regarding (1) two alternative modes of gene control, (2) three patterns of coupling gene expression in elementary circuits, (3) two types of switches in inducible gene circuits, and (4) the realizability of alternative gene circuits and their response to phased environmental cues. In each case, the predictions are supported by experimental evidence. These results are important for understanding the function, design, and evolution of elementary gene circuits. (c) 2001 American Institute of Physics.
基因表达的控制涉及复杂的回路,这些回路在设计上表现出巨大的差异。多年来,对这些差异最便捷的解释是历史偶然。按照这种观点,进化是一个随机过程,其中许多不同的设计是偶然产生的;有许多方法可以实现同一件事,因此对于这些不同但等效的设计无法赋予更多意义。近年来,至少在基因回路的某些方面,人们发现了一种基于设计原则的更令人满意的解释。所谓设计原则,我们指的是一种规则,它描述了一类系统所展现的某些生物学特征,以至于该规则的发现不仅能让人理解已知的实例,还能预测该类中的新实例。基因调控在现代分子生物学中的核心重要性为寻找更多这些潜在的设计原则提供了强大的动力。这项探索尚处于起步阶段,无疑还有许多设计原则有待发现。这篇分三部分的综述将聚焦于细菌中的基本基因回路类别。第一部分回顾了构成原核生物基本基因回路特征的几个设计要素。这些要素中的每一个都有多种实现方式,其含义通常并不明确。第二部分回顾了用于表示、分析和比较替代设计的数学方法。重点是那些已成功用于识别基本基因回路设计原则的特定方法。第三部分回顾了四条设计原则,这些原则对以下方面做出了具体预测:(1)两种基因控制的替代模式;(2)基本回路中基因表达耦合的三种模式;(3)可诱导基因回路中的两种开关类型;(4)替代基因回路的可实现性及其对阶段性环境线索的反应。在每种情况下,这些预测都得到了实验证据的支持。这些结果对于理解基本基因回路的功能、设计和进化很重要。(c)2001美国物理研究所。