Suppr超能文献

硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术同时应用与分别应用治疗痔疮的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。

A comparison of the simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately, for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Kanellos I, Goulimaris I, Christoforidis E, Kelpis T, Betsis D

机构信息

4th Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Antheon 1, GR 55236, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2003 Mar;5(2):133-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00395.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately for the treatment of 2nd degree haemorrhoids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 1996, 255 patients that suffered from 2nd degree haemorrhoids were divided into 3 groups of 85 patients, each to receive either simultaneous sclerotherapy for smaller and rubber band ligation for larger piles (SCL/RBL) in one session, or sclerotherapy (SCL), or rubber band ligation (RBL), respectively. After a period of 4 years all patients were examined and their symptoms were recorded.

RESULTS

The patients of the SCL group developed significantly fewer complications after treatment compared to the other two methods (P < 0.001), which did not differ from each other. After the SCL/RBL treatment, significantly more patients were symptom free (46%) than after SCL (8%), P < 0.001. There was no significant difference between the SCL/RBL (46%) and the RBL (31%) groups (P = 0.217), although the combined treatment seemed to be more effective than rubber band ligation. Only 10% of the patients of the SCL/RBL group needed additional sessions 6-24 months after the initial treatment compared to 30% of the patients of the SCL group (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between SCL/RBL and RBL (17%) groups (P = 0.151).

CONCLUSION

The combination of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation for treatment of 2nd degree haemorrhoids is significantly more efficient than sclerotherapy on its own.

摘要

目的

比较硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术同时应用以及分别应用于治疗二度痔疮的效果。

患者与方法

1993年至1996年间,255例二度痔疮患者被分为3组,每组85例,分别接受一次针对较小痔核的硬化疗法和针对较大痔核的橡皮圈套扎术(SCL/RBL)联合治疗、硬化疗法(SCL)或橡皮圈套扎术(RBL)。4年后对所有患者进行检查并记录其症状。

结果

与其他两种方法相比,SCL组患者治疗后出现的并发症明显更少(P < 0.001),而后两种方法之间无差异。SCL/RBL治疗后无症状的患者显著多于SCL治疗后(46%比8%),P < 0.001。SCL/RBL组(46%)与RBL组(31%)之间无显著差异(P = 0.217),尽管联合治疗似乎比橡皮圈套扎术更有效。SCL/RBL组只有10%的患者在初始治疗后6 - 24个月需要额外治疗,而SCL组为30%(P = 0.001)。然而,SCL/RBL组与RBL组(17%)之间无显著差异(P = 0.151)。

结论

硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术联合治疗二度痔疮明显比单独使用硬化疗法更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验