• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术同时应用与分别应用治疗痔疮的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。

A comparison of the simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately, for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Kanellos I, Goulimaris I, Christoforidis E, Kelpis T, Betsis D

机构信息

4th Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Antheon 1, GR 55236, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2003 Mar;5(2):133-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00395.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00395.x
PMID:12780901
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately for the treatment of 2nd degree haemorrhoids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 1996, 255 patients that suffered from 2nd degree haemorrhoids were divided into 3 groups of 85 patients, each to receive either simultaneous sclerotherapy for smaller and rubber band ligation for larger piles (SCL/RBL) in one session, or sclerotherapy (SCL), or rubber band ligation (RBL), respectively. After a period of 4 years all patients were examined and their symptoms were recorded.

RESULTS

The patients of the SCL group developed significantly fewer complications after treatment compared to the other two methods (P < 0.001), which did not differ from each other. After the SCL/RBL treatment, significantly more patients were symptom free (46%) than after SCL (8%), P < 0.001. There was no significant difference between the SCL/RBL (46%) and the RBL (31%) groups (P = 0.217), although the combined treatment seemed to be more effective than rubber band ligation. Only 10% of the patients of the SCL/RBL group needed additional sessions 6-24 months after the initial treatment compared to 30% of the patients of the SCL group (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between SCL/RBL and RBL (17%) groups (P = 0.151).

CONCLUSION

The combination of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation for treatment of 2nd degree haemorrhoids is significantly more efficient than sclerotherapy on its own.

摘要

目的

比较硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术同时应用以及分别应用于治疗二度痔疮的效果。

患者与方法

1993年至1996年间,255例二度痔疮患者被分为3组,每组85例,分别接受一次针对较小痔核的硬化疗法和针对较大痔核的橡皮圈套扎术(SCL/RBL)联合治疗、硬化疗法(SCL)或橡皮圈套扎术(RBL)。4年后对所有患者进行检查并记录其症状。

结果

与其他两种方法相比,SCL组患者治疗后出现的并发症明显更少(P < 0.001),而后两种方法之间无差异。SCL/RBL治疗后无症状的患者显著多于SCL治疗后(46%比8%),P < 0.001。SCL/RBL组(46%)与RBL组(31%)之间无显著差异(P = 0.217),尽管联合治疗似乎比橡皮圈套扎术更有效。SCL/RBL组只有10%的患者在初始治疗后6 - 24个月需要额外治疗,而SCL组为30%(P = 0.001)。然而,SCL/RBL组与RBL组(17%)之间无显著差异(P = 0.151)。

结论

硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术联合治疗二度痔疮明显比单独使用硬化疗法更有效。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately, for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized trial.硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术同时应用与分别应用治疗痔疮的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2003 Mar;5(2):133-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00395.x.
2
Outcome of the rubber band ligation with Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.橡皮圈套扎术联合Milligan Morgan痔切除术的疗效
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Oct-Dec;22(4):56-60.
3
Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.痔的治疗:橡皮圈结扎或硬化疗法(THROS)?一项多中心、非劣效性、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 3;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07400-2.
4
A randomized controlled trial of rubber band ligation versus infra-red coagulation in the treatment of internal haemorrhoids.一项关于橡皮圈套扎术与红外线凝固术治疗内痔的随机对照试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 May;12(5):535-9. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200012050-00010.
5
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.痔动脉结扎术与橡皮圈套扎术治疗有症状的二度和三度痔疮(HubBLe):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验
Lancet. 2016 Jul 23;388(10042):356-364. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30584-0. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
Comparison of rubber band ligation and sclerosant injection for first and second degree haemorrhoids-- a prospective clinical trial.橡胶圈套扎术与硬化剂注射术治疗一、二度痔的比较——一项前瞻性临床试验
Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(8):717-20.
7
Short-term and long-term results of combined sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse.硬化疗法与橡皮圈套扎术联合治疗痔疮及黏膜脱垂的短期和长期疗效
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Sep;46(9):1232-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6720-0.
8
Comparison of rubber band ligation with 3% polidocanol injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of internal haemorrhoids at a Nigerian tertiary hospital.尼日利亚一家三级医院对比胶圈套扎与 3%聚桂醇注射液硬化治疗内痔的疗效。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Oct-Dec;27(4):311-316. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_232_20.
9
A prospective study of infrared coagulation, injection and rubber band ligation in the treatment of haemorrhoids.一项关于红外线凝固、注射及橡皮圈套扎治疗痔疮的前瞻性研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990 May;5(2):113-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00298482.
10
Band ligation vs endoscopic sclerotherapy in esophageal varices: a prospective randomized comparison.食管静脉曲张套扎术与内镜下硬化剂注射治疗的前瞻性随机对照比较
J Pak Med Assoc. 1998 Jul;48(7):192-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of office-based procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病患者痔病门诊手术的疗效与安全性
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 8;29(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03144-0.
2
Shifting Paradigms in Hemorrhoid Management: The Emergence and Impact of Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy.痔疮治疗模式的转变:帽辅助内镜下硬化治疗的出现及影响
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):7284. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237284.
3
The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease.
意大利结肠直肠病统一学会(Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia)关于急慢性痔病管理的指南。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):287-320. doi: 10.3393/ac.2023.00871.0124. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.硬化疗法治疗痔疮病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jan 23;28(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02908-w.
5
Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.痔病管理中的门诊手术:橡皮圈套扎术与硬化疗法——系统评价与荟萃分析
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 8;29(6):409-419. doi: 10.1159/000522171. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Sclerobanding Is a Novel Technique for the Treatment of Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease. Reply to Jongen et al. Comment on "Pata et al. Sclerobanding (Combined Rubber Band Ligation with 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy) for the Treatment of Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease: Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes. . 2022, , 218".硬化剂套扎术是一种治疗二度和三度痔病的新技术。对容根等人的回复。关于“帕塔等人。硬化剂套扎术(联合橡皮圈套扎术与3%聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法)治疗二度和三度痔病:可行性和短期结果。。2022年,,218”的评论
J Clin Med. 2022 May 30;11(11):3078. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113078.
7
Comment on Pata et al. Sclerobanding (Combined Rubber Band Ligation with 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy) for the Treatment of Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease: Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes. 2022, , 218.对帕塔等人的评论。硬化带扎术(联合橡皮圈套扎术与3%聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法)治疗二度和三度痔病:可行性及短期疗效。2022年,,218。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 29;11(9):2495. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092495.
8
Sclerotherapy in Hemorrhoids.痔疮的硬化治疗
Indian J Surg. 2023 Apr;85(2):228-232. doi: 10.1007/s12262-022-03414-3. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
9
A Stepwise Proposal for Low-Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease: Injection Sclerotherapy as a First-Line Treatment and Rubber Band Ligation for Persistent Relapses.低度痔病的逐步治疗方案:以注射硬化疗法作为一线治疗方法,对持续复发患者采用橡皮圈套扎术
Front Surg. 2022 Jan 10;8:782800. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.782800. eCollection 2021.
10
Sclerobanding (Combined Rubber Band Ligation with 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy) for the Treatment of Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease: Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes.硬化剂套扎术(联合橡皮圈套扎术与3%聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法)治疗二度和三度痔病:可行性及短期疗效
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 31;11(1):218. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010218.