• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于有症状的受试者,临床变量并非使用乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的良好选择标准。

Clinical variables are poor selection criteria for the use of methacholine bronchoprovocation in symptomatic subjects.

作者信息

Parker Annie Lin, Abu-Hijleh Muhanned

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, 111 Brewster Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2003 Jun;48(6):596-601.

PMID:12780946
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is associated with persistent air flow limitation and accelerated FEV(1) decline. AHR can influence diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. We assessed the value of pulmonary function variables, symptoms, and history as selection criteria for methacholine bronchoprovocation testing to detect AHR in symptomatic subjects.

METHODS

Over a 4-year period we conducted a prospective study of consecutive subjects who underwent methacholine bronchoprovocation testing. Baseline pulmonary function testing (PFT) and a questionnaire were obtained prior to methacholine bronchoprovocation testing. PFT and symptom and history variables were assessed as AHR predictors in univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses for the whole group and for 4 different age groups.

RESULTS

There were 530 subjects, with ages ranging from 5 to 87 years, and 232 (44%) were positive for methacholine AHR. AHR was more prevalent among subjects < or = 25 years old (59%) and > 65 years old (47%) than among the other age groups. PFT values, symptom, and history variables had different AHR predictive values among the different age groups. Symptom and history variables had no AHR predictive value among subjects < or = 25 or > 65 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Young and elderly symptomatic subjects are more likely to have methacholine AHR. None of the clinical variables we studied has significant predictive value for methacholine AHR across the age groups, so these variables are poor selection criteria for methacholine bronchoprovocation testing of symptomatic subjects. Given the high prevalence of AHR among these subjects, bronchoprovocation should be considered with all individuals who have respiratory symptoms of wheezing, cough, shortness of breath, or chest tightness.

摘要

目的

气道高反应性(AHR)与持续性气流受限及FEV₁加速下降相关。AHR可影响诊断、治疗及预后。我们评估了肺功能变量、症状及病史作为选择标准用于检测有症状受试者中AHR的乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的价值。

方法

在4年期间,我们对连续接受乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的受试者进行了一项前瞻性研究。在乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验前获得基线肺功能测试(PFT)及一份问卷。在单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析中,对整个组以及4个不同年龄组评估PFT、症状及病史变量作为AHR预测指标的情况。

结果

共有530名受试者,年龄范围为5至87岁,232名(44%)乙酰甲胆碱AHR呈阳性。AHR在≤25岁(59%)和>65岁(47%)的受试者中比在其他年龄组中更普遍。PFT值、症状及病史变量在不同年龄组中有不同的AHR预测价值。症状及病史变量在≤25岁或>65岁的受试者中无AHR预测价值。

结论

年轻和老年有症状受试者更有可能出现乙酰甲胆碱AHR。我们研究的临床变量在各年龄组中对乙酰甲胆碱AHR均无显著预测价值,因此这些变量作为有症状受试者乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的选择标准不佳。鉴于这些受试者中AHR的高患病率,对于所有有喘息、咳嗽、呼吸急促或胸闷等呼吸道症状的个体均应考虑进行支气管激发试验。

相似文献

1
Clinical variables are poor selection criteria for the use of methacholine bronchoprovocation in symptomatic subjects.对于有症状的受试者,临床变量并非使用乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的良好选择标准。
Respir Care. 2003 Jun;48(6):596-601.
2
Airway hyperresponsiveness, peak flow variability and inflammatory markers in non-asthmatic subjects with respiratory infections.呼吸道感染的非哮喘患者的气道高反应性、呼气峰流速变异性和炎症标志物
Clin Respir J. 2007 Jul;1(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2007.00013.x.
3
Airway hyperreactivity detected by methacholine challenge in children with sickle cell disease.通过乙酰甲胆碱激发试验检测镰状细胞病患儿的气道高反应性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007 Dec;42(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20716.
4
Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma.咳嗽变异性哮喘患者中,乙酰甲胆碱与腺苷对胸内和胸外气道高反应性的影响比较
Allergy. 2008 May;63(5):527-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x.
5
[The comparison of the result of exercise bronchoprovocation test and methacholine bronchoprovocation test in athletes].[运动员运动性支气管激发试验与乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验结果的比较]
Tuberk Toraks. 2004;52(4):315-22.
6
The FEF25-75 and its decline as a predictor of methacholine responsiveness in children.用力呼气流量25%-75%及其下降情况作为儿童对乙酰甲胆碱反应性的预测指标
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):375-81. doi: 10.1080/02770900802492079.
7
A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.一种基于症状的精细化方法用于诊断儿童肺结核。
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1350-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0519.
8
Methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate challenges in preschool children with cough-variant and classic asthma.学龄前咳嗽变异性哮喘和典型哮喘患儿的乙酰甲胆碱和5'-单磷酸腺苷激发试验
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007 Oct;42(10):973-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20692.
9
Changes in airway hyperresponsiveness following smoking cessation: comparisons between Mch and AMP.戒烟后气道高反应性的变化:组胺和血管活性肠肽的比较。 (注:Mch一般指乙酰甲胆碱,这里根据语境推测应该是与气道高反应性检测相关的物质;AMP推测为血管活性肠肽,英文全称为vasoactive intestinal peptide ,但原英文表述中AMP这种简称在医学领域较少见,可能存在信息不完整或有误的情况,正常应该是英文全称表述会更准确清晰。不过按照要求直接翻译就是上述译文 )
Respir Med. 2008 Feb;102(2):256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
10
Diagnosing asthma in children: what is the role for methacholine bronchoprovocation testing?儿童哮喘的诊断:乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验有何作用?
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 May;43(5):481-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20801.