Hughes Edward, Spry Paul, Diamond Jeremy
Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX, UK.
J Glaucoma. 2003 Jun;12(3):232-6. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200306000-00009.
Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is well recognized, yet important decisions in glaucoma management are frequently made after 1 or 2 IOP measurements. Twenty-four-hour monitoring of IOP may identify IOP variation and spikes. This study determined the value of 24-hour IOP monitoring in routine clinical practice.
Data were acquired retrospectively from case notes of 29 glaucoma patients sequentially admitted for 24-hour IOP monitoring while taking their established antiglaucoma therapy.
While there was no difference between the mean clinic (office) and mean 24-hour IOP measurements, the peak IOP during 24-hour monitoring was on average 4.9 mm Hg higher than the peak clinic IOP (P<0.0001). In 4 (13.8%) patients, the peak IOP over 24 hours was at least 12 mm Hg higher than the clinic peak. Peak IOP values occurred outside normal office hours in 51.7% of patients. Twenty-four-hour IOP monitoring resulted in a change of clinical management in 23 (79.3%) patients, including 13 (44.8%) who were offered trabeculectomy.
Twenty-four-hour monitoring of IOP frequently led to a change of glaucoma management by identifying IOP fluctuations and spikes. High IOP and wide diurnal IOP variation are considered major risk factors for glaucoma progression, and standard clinic follow-up evaluations failed to identify these phenomena.
眼压(IOP)的昼夜变化已得到充分认识,但青光眼治疗中的重要决策往往是在进行1或2次眼压测量后做出的。24小时眼压监测可能会发现眼压变化和峰值。本研究确定了24小时眼压监测在常规临床实践中的价值。
回顾性收集29例青光眼患者的病历资料,这些患者在接受既定的抗青光眼治疗时依次入院进行24小时眼压监测。
虽然门诊(诊室)平均眼压与24小时平均眼压测量值之间没有差异,但24小时监测期间的眼压峰值平均比门诊眼压峰值高4.9毫米汞柱(P<0.0001)。在4例(13.8%)患者中,24小时眼压峰值比门诊峰值至少高12毫米汞柱。51.7%的患者眼压峰值出现在正常办公时间之外。24小时眼压监测导致23例(79.3%)患者的临床治疗发生改变,其中13例(44.8%)接受了小梁切除术。
24小时眼压监测通过识别眼压波动和峰值,常常导致青光眼治疗方案的改变。高眼压和较大的昼夜眼压变化被认为是青光眼进展的主要危险因素,而标准的门诊随访评估未能发现这些现象。